These are helpful heuristics and I found myself employing a similar approach during the earliest period of the 'pandemic'. It is why I thought all the politicians and public health 'experts' who were found to be continually breaking lockdowns rule so important. So this is supposed to be the deadliest and horrifying viral wave of all time, and you're telling everyone to stay home and disrupt all societal processes -- but actually you're out gallivanting and
1. cheating on your wife (Matt Hancock, UK health secretary at the time)
2. cheating on someone else's wife (Neil Ferguson, UK fake health prophet who said UK will have 500k deaths from covid and that's with a vaccine, and who said we need to stay locked down)
3. going to restaurants secretly ("French Laundry") when you're telling everyone to stay home and shutting down businesses and schools (Gavin Newsom, California)
and so on.
It was more than mere hypocrisy. It just kept happening, and it was happening to the people who are supposedly the most clued in to the 'dangers' we were exposed, and had 'the most to lose' because it's just so important to have people like Newsom, Hancock, Ferguson, and the other fools at the helm.
Again we saw this everywhere. The other notable example was the secret festivities of Boris Johnson and his buddies in the UK.
When this is happening to the people who are executing the biggest transformation of society, who are constantly shaming the populace for doing things like going to the beach, then it is as you say, a MAJOR discrepancy, and it is no mere puritan policing on our part. Given the supposed stakes ("covid is a threat to everyone), it is obvious the complete divergence between public speech and private action reveals the emptiness of their perspective. Consider how people, especially the 'elites', would have acted, if there was a real crisis where the mere breathing of air was a significant threat. They certainly wouldn't be engaging in trivial trysts that could put them at risk.
By the way, there is a discussion group which had focused on collecting these instances, if you ever need references for future posts. It is called "LockdownHypocrites". Here are 2 archival snapshots, one from a year ago and one from today.
Also, I never saw that interview with you and Dr. Malone before.
It reminds me, did you ever happen to see the following paper? If not, I think it would be of great interest, because it focuses on the DNA/reverse-transcription question regarding the mRNA vaccines. Coincidentally, the abstract I will quote from also mentions a big discrepancy, our current theme.
>mRNA Vaccines: Why Is the Biology of Retroposition Ignored?
"Here, I discuss the pervasive claim that mRNA-based vaccines cannot alter genomes. Surprisingly, this notion is widely stated in the mRNA vaccine literature but never supported by referencing any primary scientific papers that would specifically address this question. This discrepancy becomes even more puzzling if one considers previous work on the molecular and evolutionary aspects of retroposition in murine and human populations that clearly documents the frequent integration of mRNA molecules into genomes, including clinical contexts. By performing basic comparisons, I show that the sequence features of mRNA vaccines meet all known requirements for retroposition using L1 elements—the most abundant autonomously active retrotransposons in the human genome. In fact, many factors associated with mRNA vaccines increase the possibility of their L1-mediated retroposition. I conclude that is unfounded to a priori assume that mRNA-based therapeutics do not impact genomes and that the route to genome integration of vaccine mRNAs via endogenous L1 retroelements is easily conceivable."
It's like they had absolutely no qualms about lying about retrotransposition and integration. I never would have believed such a grand lie could have happened until it did.
Even I as a layman was in disbelief at how trivially the health 'authorities' seemed concerned with this issue. So you're telling me there's a potentially catastrophic flaw in these products, that could unfathomably change the future of humanity, and you're saying you can't spend a couple of weeks and a couple of rats to rule this out? Seriously? I asked some pro-vax people about it. Their answer: we didn't investigate it, so we didn't find any evidence of harm. Therefore it's safe.
Realized we were in extra hot water at that point.
Discrepancy analysis is the perfect description of the cognitive process leading to cognitive freedom from the enslaving criminals and soulless gangsters blindly serving their master(s). Thank you for making it so clear. I was not able to describe something I also do daily with my patients
Hi Dr. Nagase. I’ve just discovered you, by way of Sage Hana, and just subscribed. I’ve always been amazed by people who seem to have an innate ability to analyze an extremely complex issue and, more importantly, to convey it to others in an understandable and logical way. I look forward to reading past articles and many more in the future. Thank you
Dr. Nagase, I am but 1 of many who support your courage to administer life saving advice to those in need. You have put forth your medical ethics above your license which has proven to be life saving. We are in depopulation mode everywhere by those we used to trust but can no longer. Humanity is proud for your unselfish contribution. I will pray for your survival and know we will emerge victorious.
Malone strikes me as Narcissistic. Such folk are not motivated by the kindness of their hearts. They are motivated by how they are perceived, money power and comfort.
Agreed —to a point. If we had been as armed with discernment at its inception & unfolding as we are now, it would have had no traction —especially not here. Much has changed. We are wiser, awake, alert and willing to be brave. The controlled media is defanged, the med system is no longer trusted, the power overreaches have been checked and those powers know they have unwittingly aroused the long hibernating giant — we will not be caught slumbering again; we have freedom of mind and heart we did not then — because we have now taken it — what is ours by right. They are becoming aware that they are rightly afraid of us. They’ve been busted.
It’s not over. But we have only begun to fight. We will win.
Nov 17, 2023·edited Nov 17, 2023Liked by Daniel Nagase MD
Yep. If you think you can’t win you will not fight. Too many doomers around. There is a plethora of bad stuff. But there’s a massive amount of good buried too. Do you think *they* want us to see it? No. *They* want us dooming. The good Truth has to be sought out & their narratives busted bc our minds and hearts are the battlefield.
I've been aware of the ruling class / conspiracy since about 1964 and after a rush of hope haven't had a glimmer since. Cant' say that I'm surprised, unfortunately. I hate to be a doomer, but. . . .
Add to that Malone's comments to the Honolulu City Council in late 2021. I was one of the speakers that day and was surprised to hear him say that the transfection "vaccines" were "working as expected".
Malone states his concern clearly here, betraying what I think is an inordinate deference to the Establishment. He is cautioning about speculation which will be used against vaxxx critics by the Establishment. In my view, the message should have been the vaxxx should not have been released until there was certainty reverse transcription would NOT occur:
Dr. Malone: "We're under intense pressure... we have to be super careful about our messaging and what we're stating...not useful to speculate about things like integration (of DNA from reverse transcribed RNA) “
I think he stepped away, as Dr N began mention reverse transcription, so as to quickly look up any info & compose his response — to discredit what Dr N was saying and to oh-so-subtly belittle the man and his standing as a scientist, and to also re-establish himself in everyone’s eyes as the unimpeachable best authority.
He did not listen to anything Dr N had said. Instead he went out to weaponize. Extremely unprofessional and disrespectful — but very practiced in SEEMING so. His arrogance is boundless. He tosses us bones and gristle. He is one to be distrusted, for he is as calculating and insincere as they come, and also brilliant. Watch out!
Malone states his concern clearly here, betraying what I think is an inordinate deference to the Establishment. He is cautioning about speculation which will be used against vaxxx critics by the Establishment. In my view, the message should have been the vaxxx should not have been released until there was certainty reverse transcription would NOT occur:
Dr. Malone: "We're under intense pressure... we have to be super careful about our messaging and what we're stating...not useful to speculate about things like integration (of DNA from reverse transcribed RNA) “
Trump and Malone: "my bosses tell me that I can't say anything bad about the kill shots until 202#", "after that I can give a straight answer like":Trump "no one could have conceived of terrorists putting bad stuff in all the vials!"; Malone "I didn't think it would make a difference and I would have been ostracized from all my government panels and lose sll those EXTREMELY LUCRATIVE CONTRACTS!"
Another point about Malone: He is a consultant and advocate for a COVID vaxx produced in India, apparently not an mRNA one. Malone is not in any way an anti-vaxxer nor even strong vaxxx critic. I listened to his very technical pitch for the India vaxxx in which he mentions the aluminum adjuvant suspected by anti-vaxxxers as being a major problem. According to Del Bigtree and his lawyers, the CDC has admitted they have never tested this adjuvant for safety in human, but only in rats fed it orally, certainly not equivalent to injection. Supposedly, Bigtree erroneously labelled Malone in a broadcast an anti-vaxxer because of his criticism of the mRNA covid vaxxxes. Malone refused to ever appear with Bigtree again.
HOWEVER, in spite of all this it is erroneous to jump to the conclusion he is CONTROLLED OPPOSITION. Of course, that is possible, but without evidence it is better to consider him a vaccinologist who refuses to deny clear safety signals. More vaccinologists should be encouraged to follow suit.
Jul 1, 2023·edited Jul 1, 2023Liked by Daniel Nagase MD
It would appear that he is indeed a slimy fellow, after reading the well-documented article exposing his prior knowledge of the absolute danger of the mRNA “vaccines” and his self-suppression of same — most helpfully provided in Lloyd Miller’s first post, above:
I cannot begin to read his motives, but he clearly does not tell the truth, the WHOLE truth and nothing but the truth. It is classic CYA, since he knows the eventual outcome: Nuremberg II !
But he is also a typical person imbedded in the Establishment except head and shoulders above the vast number LIKE HIM who won't admit the mRNA vaxxx dangerous, even deadly. Also, he was in no position to put the cabosh on the vaxxx in the face of a full blown Establishment, Big Pharma, MSM propaganda campaign.
One thing that comes to mind is the truth might be more urgent than "communication", in which case truth could easily be deemed - or feared as - hazardous, disruptive, confusing and what not. This has clearly happened in the clash you had with dr. Malone. I don't know whether dr. Malone would have perceived a clash with dr. Nagase - either back then (2021/2), or now, autumn/fall 2024.
As a fiction writer {someone who is aware of the use of pronouns, and deems the word 'we' more problematic than any singular pronoun or plural pronoouns used as a mode of avoiding a singular pronoun}, I find the way Malone uses 'we' in Nagase's quotes problematic - at least when the author or 'sender' fails to specify who 'we' is (or are); tries to dissuade or... {piggy-backing on a pun from the inimitable Mark Crispin Miller) ...to 'dis-sway' readers from looking at thnigs like 'reverse transcriptase'.
I am convinced dr. Nagase would have looked at more serious arguments against (the significance of) reverse transcriptase [why '-tase', not '-tion'?], although I am guessing that what has been brought to light on 'Replicon' might enhance mr. Nagase's reverse transcriptase argument back then (I have no way of knowing such a thing)...
I must confess I find the notion that gov'ts are out there to kill us hard to swallow. Especially since formerly like-minded people still seem to be on board with official protocols / narrratives, no mater how many casualties (killings rather) they are willing (some: hoping) to inflict (or to ignore, in case you find yourself in the "lower orders") - and this wilful ignorance includes people on the 'murder roll'.
Distrusting gov'ts wouldn't be hard were I raised in a First Nations community... although some in those quarters might be 'swayed' by a "faux green" narrative or some variant thereof (some of which are even valid).
I knew a psychopath very well. A neurosurgeon. He was very adept at playing the victim. Just because someone says they are victim does not indicate that they took the jab. I would not even accept the primary statement.
I am familiar with eye accessing curs, and looking up right could mean lying or could mean composing the best way to state whatever they are formulating.
Yes, Malone is a bs figure with big ties to cia and military. One never leaves the mafia. In my mind DARPA ind the three letter boys have a similar work ethic.
These are helpful heuristics and I found myself employing a similar approach during the earliest period of the 'pandemic'. It is why I thought all the politicians and public health 'experts' who were found to be continually breaking lockdowns rule so important. So this is supposed to be the deadliest and horrifying viral wave of all time, and you're telling everyone to stay home and disrupt all societal processes -- but actually you're out gallivanting and
1. cheating on your wife (Matt Hancock, UK health secretary at the time)
2. cheating on someone else's wife (Neil Ferguson, UK fake health prophet who said UK will have 500k deaths from covid and that's with a vaccine, and who said we need to stay locked down)
3. going to restaurants secretly ("French Laundry") when you're telling everyone to stay home and shutting down businesses and schools (Gavin Newsom, California)
and so on.
It was more than mere hypocrisy. It just kept happening, and it was happening to the people who are supposedly the most clued in to the 'dangers' we were exposed, and had 'the most to lose' because it's just so important to have people like Newsom, Hancock, Ferguson, and the other fools at the helm.
Again we saw this everywhere. The other notable example was the secret festivities of Boris Johnson and his buddies in the UK.
When this is happening to the people who are executing the biggest transformation of society, who are constantly shaming the populace for doing things like going to the beach, then it is as you say, a MAJOR discrepancy, and it is no mere puritan policing on our part. Given the supposed stakes ("covid is a threat to everyone), it is obvious the complete divergence between public speech and private action reveals the emptiness of their perspective. Consider how people, especially the 'elites', would have acted, if there was a real crisis where the mere breathing of air was a significant threat. They certainly wouldn't be engaging in trivial trysts that could put them at risk.
By the way, there is a discussion group which had focused on collecting these instances, if you ever need references for future posts. It is called "LockdownHypocrites". Here are 2 archival snapshots, one from a year ago and one from today.
https://archive.is/BL7ph
https://archive.is/ENVB7
Also, I never saw that interview with you and Dr. Malone before.
It reminds me, did you ever happen to see the following paper? If not, I think it would be of great interest, because it focuses on the DNA/reverse-transcription question regarding the mRNA vaccines. Coincidentally, the abstract I will quote from also mentions a big discrepancy, our current theme.
>mRNA Vaccines: Why Is the Biology of Retroposition Ignored?
Tomislav Domazet-Lošo. Genes (Basel). 2022 May; 13(5): 719.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141755/
Abstract excerpt:
"Here, I discuss the pervasive claim that mRNA-based vaccines cannot alter genomes. Surprisingly, this notion is widely stated in the mRNA vaccine literature but never supported by referencing any primary scientific papers that would specifically address this question. This discrepancy becomes even more puzzling if one considers previous work on the molecular and evolutionary aspects of retroposition in murine and human populations that clearly documents the frequent integration of mRNA molecules into genomes, including clinical contexts. By performing basic comparisons, I show that the sequence features of mRNA vaccines meet all known requirements for retroposition using L1 elements—the most abundant autonomously active retrotransposons in the human genome. In fact, many factors associated with mRNA vaccines increase the possibility of their L1-mediated retroposition. I conclude that is unfounded to a priori assume that mRNA-based therapeutics do not impact genomes and that the route to genome integration of vaccine mRNAs via endogenous L1 retroelements is easily conceivable."
It's like they had absolutely no qualms about lying about retrotransposition and integration. I never would have believed such a grand lie could have happened until it did.
Even I as a layman was in disbelief at how trivially the health 'authorities' seemed concerned with this issue. So you're telling me there's a potentially catastrophic flaw in these products, that could unfathomably change the future of humanity, and you're saying you can't spend a couple of weeks and a couple of rats to rule this out? Seriously? I asked some pro-vax people about it. Their answer: we didn't investigate it, so we didn't find any evidence of harm. Therefore it's safe.
Realized we were in extra hot water at that point.
The old “absence of evidence is evidence of absence” trick.
I wrote this about RW Malone:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-w-malone
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-w-malone-d0c
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-malone-and-countermeasures
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-malone-the-5-billion-contract
https://outraged.substack.com/p/r-w-malone-speaks-out
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-w-malone-vaccines-on-demand
https://outraged.substack.com/p/operation-warp-speed-father-robert
No, Sir, he is not to tell the truth, but to hide it
Discrepancy analysis is the perfect description of the cognitive process leading to cognitive freedom from the enslaving criminals and soulless gangsters blindly serving their master(s). Thank you for making it so clear. I was not able to describe something I also do daily with my patients
Hi Dr. Nagase. I’ve just discovered you, by way of Sage Hana, and just subscribed. I’ve always been amazed by people who seem to have an innate ability to analyze an extremely complex issue and, more importantly, to convey it to others in an understandable and logical way. I look forward to reading past articles and many more in the future. Thank you
Dr. Nagase, I am but 1 of many who support your courage to administer life saving advice to those in need. You have put forth your medical ethics above your license which has proven to be life saving. We are in depopulation mode everywhere by those we used to trust but can no longer. Humanity is proud for your unselfish contribution. I will pray for your survival and know we will emerge victorious.
God bless you and family.
Malone strikes me as Narcissistic. Such folk are not motivated by the kindness of their hearts. They are motivated by how they are perceived, money power and comfort.
Now we have an up-dated charge from the Breggins:
Could This Man (Malone) Have Saved the World?
Suppressed in 2020 his own finding the vaxxx should not be released?
https://www.americaoutloud.com/could-this-man-have-saved-the-world/
Wow! Thank you! Everyone should read and spread this.
Great links are there as well.
But NO ONE with whatever knowledge could have stopped the PLANDEMIC in the face of the most powerful people in the world.
Agreed —to a point. If we had been as armed with discernment at its inception & unfolding as we are now, it would have had no traction —especially not here. Much has changed. We are wiser, awake, alert and willing to be brave. The controlled media is defanged, the med system is no longer trusted, the power overreaches have been checked and those powers know they have unwittingly aroused the long hibernating giant — we will not be caught slumbering again; we have freedom of mind and heart we did not then — because we have now taken it — what is ours by right. They are becoming aware that they are rightly afraid of us. They’ve been busted.
It’s not over. But we have only begun to fight. We will win.
Pretty optimistic, but I hope you are right.
Yep. If you think you can’t win you will not fight. Too many doomers around. There is a plethora of bad stuff. But there’s a massive amount of good buried too. Do you think *they* want us to see it? No. *They* want us dooming. The good Truth has to be sought out & their narratives busted bc our minds and hearts are the battlefield.
All the BEST and Blessings.
I've been aware of the ruling class / conspiracy since about 1964 and after a rush of hope haven't had a glimmer since. Cant' say that I'm surprised, unfortunately. I hate to be a doomer, but. . . .
Add to that Malone's comments to the Honolulu City Council in late 2021. I was one of the speakers that day and was surprised to hear him say that the transfection "vaccines" were "working as expected".
Malone states his concern clearly here, betraying what I think is an inordinate deference to the Establishment. He is cautioning about speculation which will be used against vaxxx critics by the Establishment. In my view, the message should have been the vaxxx should not have been released until there was certainty reverse transcription would NOT occur:
Dr. Malone: "We're under intense pressure... we have to be super careful about our messaging and what we're stating...not useful to speculate about things like integration (of DNA from reverse transcribed RNA) “
I think he stepped away, as Dr N began mention reverse transcription, so as to quickly look up any info & compose his response — to discredit what Dr N was saying and to oh-so-subtly belittle the man and his standing as a scientist, and to also re-establish himself in everyone’s eyes as the unimpeachable best authority.
He did not listen to anything Dr N had said. Instead he went out to weaponize. Extremely unprofessional and disrespectful — but very practiced in SEEMING so. His arrogance is boundless. He tosses us bones and gristle. He is one to be distrusted, for he is as calculating and insincere as they come, and also brilliant. Watch out!
BTW Dr. Nagase, concerning our earlier comments on the reverse transcription concern, I just saw this substack about a recent journal article: https://syedhaider.substack.com/p/more-proof-mrna-shots-edit-human
It discusses the following:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.02.10.527906v1.full
Maybe of interest for a future breakdown as well... sharing in case it hasn't come your way yet.
Thank you!. It was the missing piece to the article I was working on since Wednesday.
Glad it could help!
And thanks for the recommendation/sub!
What do I think? I know that Malone is an Intelligence Industrial Complex asset that has done much harm.
He's suing the Breggins, Jane Ruby, and there's a video out there of him trying to get kids in Hawaii "unscared" of the mRNA vaccine.
WHAT!?
The most surprising things are bits of info surmised in one's nightmares.
Malone states his concern clearly here, betraying what I think is an inordinate deference to the Establishment. He is cautioning about speculation which will be used against vaxxx critics by the Establishment. In my view, the message should have been the vaxxx should not have been released until there was certainty reverse transcription would NOT occur:
Dr. Malone: "We're under intense pressure... we have to be super careful about our messaging and what we're stating...not useful to speculate about things like integration (of DNA from reverse transcribed RNA) “
Trump and Malone: "my bosses tell me that I can't say anything bad about the kill shots until 202#", "after that I can give a straight answer like":Trump "no one could have conceived of terrorists putting bad stuff in all the vials!"; Malone "I didn't think it would make a difference and I would have been ostracized from all my government panels and lose sll those EXTREMELY LUCRATIVE CONTRACTS!"
Not credible unless you have the recording.
Another point about Malone: He is a consultant and advocate for a COVID vaxx produced in India, apparently not an mRNA one. Malone is not in any way an anti-vaxxer nor even strong vaxxx critic. I listened to his very technical pitch for the India vaxxx in which he mentions the aluminum adjuvant suspected by anti-vaxxxers as being a major problem. According to Del Bigtree and his lawyers, the CDC has admitted they have never tested this adjuvant for safety in human, but only in rats fed it orally, certainly not equivalent to injection. Supposedly, Bigtree erroneously labelled Malone in a broadcast an anti-vaxxer because of his criticism of the mRNA covid vaxxxes. Malone refused to ever appear with Bigtree again.
HOWEVER, in spite of all this it is erroneous to jump to the conclusion he is CONTROLLED OPPOSITION. Of course, that is possible, but without evidence it is better to consider him a vaccinologist who refuses to deny clear safety signals. More vaccinologists should be encouraged to follow suit.
It would appear that he is indeed a slimy fellow, after reading the well-documented article exposing his prior knowledge of the absolute danger of the mRNA “vaccines” and his self-suppression of same — most helpfully provided in Lloyd Miller’s first post, above:
https://www.americaoutloud.com/could-this-man-have-saved-the-world/ .
He is a walking, talking limited hangout AT BEST.
I cannot begin to read his motives, but he clearly does not tell the truth, the WHOLE truth and nothing but the truth. It is classic CYA, since he knows the eventual outcome: Nuremberg II !
But he is also a typical person imbedded in the Establishment except head and shoulders above the vast number LIKE HIM who won't admit the mRNA vaxxx dangerous, even deadly. Also, he was in no position to put the cabosh on the vaxxx in the face of a full blown Establishment, Big Pharma, MSM propaganda campaign.
Powerful! Thank you
He is a 🐍
One thing that comes to mind is the truth might be more urgent than "communication", in which case truth could easily be deemed - or feared as - hazardous, disruptive, confusing and what not. This has clearly happened in the clash you had with dr. Malone. I don't know whether dr. Malone would have perceived a clash with dr. Nagase - either back then (2021/2), or now, autumn/fall 2024.
As a fiction writer {someone who is aware of the use of pronouns, and deems the word 'we' more problematic than any singular pronoun or plural pronoouns used as a mode of avoiding a singular pronoun}, I find the way Malone uses 'we' in Nagase's quotes problematic - at least when the author or 'sender' fails to specify who 'we' is (or are); tries to dissuade or... {piggy-backing on a pun from the inimitable Mark Crispin Miller) ...to 'dis-sway' readers from looking at thnigs like 'reverse transcriptase'.
I am convinced dr. Nagase would have looked at more serious arguments against (the significance of) reverse transcriptase [why '-tase', not '-tion'?], although I am guessing that what has been brought to light on 'Replicon' might enhance mr. Nagase's reverse transcriptase argument back then (I have no way of knowing such a thing)...
I must confess I find the notion that gov'ts are out there to kill us hard to swallow. Especially since formerly like-minded people still seem to be on board with official protocols / narrratives, no mater how many casualties (killings rather) they are willing (some: hoping) to inflict (or to ignore, in case you find yourself in the "lower orders") - and this wilful ignorance includes people on the 'murder roll'.
Distrusting gov'ts wouldn't be hard were I raised in a First Nations community... although some in those quarters might be 'swayed' by a "faux green" narrative or some variant thereof (some of which are even valid).
I knew a psychopath very well. A neurosurgeon. He was very adept at playing the victim. Just because someone says they are victim does not indicate that they took the jab. I would not even accept the primary statement.
I am familiar with eye accessing curs, and looking up right could mean lying or could mean composing the best way to state whatever they are formulating.
Yes, Malone is a bs figure with big ties to cia and military. One never leaves the mafia. In my mind DARPA ind the three letter boys have a similar work ethic.