These are helpful heuristics and I found myself employing a similar approach during the earliest period of the 'pandemic'. It is why I thought all the politicians and public health 'experts' who were found to be continually breaking lockdowns rule so important. So this is supposed to be the deadliest and horrifying viral wave of all time, and you're telling everyone to stay home and disrupt all societal processes -- but actually you're out gallivanting and
1. cheating on your wife (Matt Hancock, UK health secretary at the time)
2. cheating on someone else's wife (Neil Ferguson, UK fake health prophet who said UK will have 500k deaths from covid and that's with a vaccine, and who said we need to stay locked down)
3. going to restaurants secretly ("French Laundry") when you're telling everyone to stay home and shutting down businesses and schools (Gavin Newsom, California)
and so on.
It was more than mere hypocrisy. It just kept happening, and it was happening to the people who are supposedly the most clued in to the 'dangers' we were exposed, and had 'the most to lose' because it's just so important to have people like Newsom, Hancock, Ferguson, and the other fools at the helm.
Again we saw this everywhere. The other notable example was the secret festivities of Boris Johnson and his buddies in the UK.
When this is happening to the people who are executing the biggest transformation of society, who are constantly shaming the populace for doing things like going to the beach, then it is as you say, a MAJOR discrepancy, and it is no mere puritan policing on our part. Given the supposed stakes ("covid is a threat to everyone), it is obvious the complete divergence between public speech and private action reveals the emptiness of their perspective. Consider how people, especially the 'elites', would have acted, if there was a real crisis where the mere breathing of air was a significant threat. They certainly wouldn't be engaging in trivial trysts that could put them at risk.
By the way, there is a discussion group which had focused on collecting these instances, if you ever need references for future posts. It is called "LockdownHypocrites". Here are 2 archival snapshots, one from a year ago and one from today.
Also, I never saw that interview with you and Dr. Malone before.
It reminds me, did you ever happen to see the following paper? If not, I think it would be of great interest, because it focuses on the DNA/reverse-transcription question regarding the mRNA vaccines. Coincidentally, the abstract I will quote from also mentions a big discrepancy, our current theme.
>mRNA Vaccines: Why Is the Biology of Retroposition Ignored?
"Here, I discuss the pervasive claim that mRNA-based vaccines cannot alter genomes. Surprisingly, this notion is widely stated in the mRNA vaccine literature but never supported by referencing any primary scientific papers that would specifically address this question. This discrepancy becomes even more puzzling if one considers previous work on the molecular and evolutionary aspects of retroposition in murine and human populations that clearly documents the frequent integration of mRNA molecules into genomes, including clinical contexts. By performing basic comparisons, I show that the sequence features of mRNA vaccines meet all known requirements for retroposition using L1 elements—the most abundant autonomously active retrotransposons in the human genome. In fact, many factors associated with mRNA vaccines increase the possibility of their L1-mediated retroposition. I conclude that is unfounded to a priori assume that mRNA-based therapeutics do not impact genomes and that the route to genome integration of vaccine mRNAs via endogenous L1 retroelements is easily conceivable."
Discrepancy analysis is the perfect description of the cognitive process leading to cognitive freedom from the enslaving criminals and soulless gangsters blindly serving their master(s). Thank you for making it so clear. I was not able to describe something I also do daily with my patients
Hi Dr. Nagase. I’ve just discovered you, by way of Sage Hana, and just subscribed. I’ve always been amazed by people who seem to have an innate ability to analyze an extremely complex issue and, more importantly, to convey it to others in an understandable and logical way. I look forward to reading past articles and many more in the future. Thank you
Dr. Nagase, I am but 1 of many who support your courage to administer life saving advice to those in need. You have put forth your medical ethics above your license which has proven to be life saving. We are in depopulation mode everywhere by those we used to trust but can no longer. Humanity is proud for your unselfish contribution. I will pray for your survival and know we will emerge victorious.
Malone strikes me as Narcissistic. Such folk are not motivated by the kindness of their hearts. They are motivated by how they are perceived, money power and comfort.
Add to that Malone's comments to the Honolulu City Council in late 2021. I was one of the speakers that day and was surprised to hear him say that the transfection "vaccines" were "working as expected".
Malone states his concern clearly here, betraying what I think is an inordinate deference to the Establishment. He is cautioning about speculation which will be used against vaxxx critics by the Establishment. In my view, the message should have been the vaxxx should not have been released until there was certainty reverse transcription would NOT occur:
Dr. Malone: "We're under intense pressure... we have to be super careful about our messaging and what we're stating...not useful to speculate about things like integration (of DNA from reverse transcribed RNA) “
Malone states his concern clearly here, betraying what I think is an inordinate deference to the Establishment. He is cautioning about speculation which will be used against vaxxx critics by the Establishment. In my view, the message should have been the vaxxx should not have been released until there was certainty reverse transcription would NOT occur:
Dr. Malone: "We're under intense pressure... we have to be super careful about our messaging and what we're stating...not useful to speculate about things like integration (of DNA from reverse transcribed RNA) “
Another point about Malone: He is a consultant and advocate for a COVID vaxx produced in India, apparently not an mRNA one. Malone is not in any way an anti-vaxxer nor even strong vaxxx critic. I listened to his very technical pitch for the India vaxxx in which he mentions the aluminum adjuvant suspected by anti-vaxxxers as being a major problem. According to Del Bigtree and his lawyers, the CDC has admitted they have never tested this adjuvant for safety in human, but only in rats fed it orally, certainly not equivalent to injection. Supposedly, Bigtree erroneously labelled Malone in a broadcast an anti-vaxxer because of his criticism of the mRNA covid vaxxxes. Malone refused to ever appear with Bigtree again.
HOWEVER, in spite of all this it is erroneous to jump to the conclusion he is CONTROLLED OPPOSITION. Of course, that is possible, but without evidence it is better to consider him a vaccinologist who refuses to deny clear safety signals. More vaccinologists should be encouraged to follow suit.
I deem dr Peterson to be a pompous fool (always did, but I'm now past the age of listening to deepities in moral or "life-artsy" promulgations by authority figures) who may be right on some issues some of the time. Am I prejudiced? Maybe. And maybe prejudice is fruitful - so as not to have my time stolen.
Whereas your analysis (in slow time...) of possible implications, ramifications and discrepancies of Peterson's Byzantine utterances is extremely useful, dr. Nagase - teaching us HOW to think and speak.
These are helpful heuristics and I found myself employing a similar approach during the earliest period of the 'pandemic'. It is why I thought all the politicians and public health 'experts' who were found to be continually breaking lockdowns rule so important. So this is supposed to be the deadliest and horrifying viral wave of all time, and you're telling everyone to stay home and disrupt all societal processes -- but actually you're out gallivanting and
1. cheating on your wife (Matt Hancock, UK health secretary at the time)
2. cheating on someone else's wife (Neil Ferguson, UK fake health prophet who said UK will have 500k deaths from covid and that's with a vaccine, and who said we need to stay locked down)
3. going to restaurants secretly ("French Laundry") when you're telling everyone to stay home and shutting down businesses and schools (Gavin Newsom, California)
and so on.
It was more than mere hypocrisy. It just kept happening, and it was happening to the people who are supposedly the most clued in to the 'dangers' we were exposed, and had 'the most to lose' because it's just so important to have people like Newsom, Hancock, Ferguson, and the other fools at the helm.
Again we saw this everywhere. The other notable example was the secret festivities of Boris Johnson and his buddies in the UK.
When this is happening to the people who are executing the biggest transformation of society, who are constantly shaming the populace for doing things like going to the beach, then it is as you say, a MAJOR discrepancy, and it is no mere puritan policing on our part. Given the supposed stakes ("covid is a threat to everyone), it is obvious the complete divergence between public speech and private action reveals the emptiness of their perspective. Consider how people, especially the 'elites', would have acted, if there was a real crisis where the mere breathing of air was a significant threat. They certainly wouldn't be engaging in trivial trysts that could put them at risk.
By the way, there is a discussion group which had focused on collecting these instances, if you ever need references for future posts. It is called "LockdownHypocrites". Here are 2 archival snapshots, one from a year ago and one from today.
https://archive.is/BL7ph
https://archive.is/ENVB7
Also, I never saw that interview with you and Dr. Malone before.
It reminds me, did you ever happen to see the following paper? If not, I think it would be of great interest, because it focuses on the DNA/reverse-transcription question regarding the mRNA vaccines. Coincidentally, the abstract I will quote from also mentions a big discrepancy, our current theme.
>mRNA Vaccines: Why Is the Biology of Retroposition Ignored?
Tomislav Domazet-Lošo. Genes (Basel). 2022 May; 13(5): 719.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141755/
Abstract excerpt:
"Here, I discuss the pervasive claim that mRNA-based vaccines cannot alter genomes. Surprisingly, this notion is widely stated in the mRNA vaccine literature but never supported by referencing any primary scientific papers that would specifically address this question. This discrepancy becomes even more puzzling if one considers previous work on the molecular and evolutionary aspects of retroposition in murine and human populations that clearly documents the frequent integration of mRNA molecules into genomes, including clinical contexts. By performing basic comparisons, I show that the sequence features of mRNA vaccines meet all known requirements for retroposition using L1 elements—the most abundant autonomously active retrotransposons in the human genome. In fact, many factors associated with mRNA vaccines increase the possibility of their L1-mediated retroposition. I conclude that is unfounded to a priori assume that mRNA-based therapeutics do not impact genomes and that the route to genome integration of vaccine mRNAs via endogenous L1 retroelements is easily conceivable."
Discrepancy analysis is the perfect description of the cognitive process leading to cognitive freedom from the enslaving criminals and soulless gangsters blindly serving their master(s). Thank you for making it so clear. I was not able to describe something I also do daily with my patients
Hi Dr. Nagase. I’ve just discovered you, by way of Sage Hana, and just subscribed. I’ve always been amazed by people who seem to have an innate ability to analyze an extremely complex issue and, more importantly, to convey it to others in an understandable and logical way. I look forward to reading past articles and many more in the future. Thank you
Dr. Nagase, I am but 1 of many who support your courage to administer life saving advice to those in need. You have put forth your medical ethics above your license which has proven to be life saving. We are in depopulation mode everywhere by those we used to trust but can no longer. Humanity is proud for your unselfish contribution. I will pray for your survival and know we will emerge victorious.
God bless you and family.
Now we have an up-dated charge from the Breggins:
Could This Man (Malone) Have Saved the World?
Suppressed in 2020 his own finding the vaxxx should not be released?
https://www.americaoutloud.com/could-this-man-have-saved-the-world/
Malone strikes me as Narcissistic. Such folk are not motivated by the kindness of their hearts. They are motivated by how they are perceived, money power and comfort.
Add to that Malone's comments to the Honolulu City Council in late 2021. I was one of the speakers that day and was surprised to hear him say that the transfection "vaccines" were "working as expected".
Malone states his concern clearly here, betraying what I think is an inordinate deference to the Establishment. He is cautioning about speculation which will be used against vaxxx critics by the Establishment. In my view, the message should have been the vaxxx should not have been released until there was certainty reverse transcription would NOT occur:
Dr. Malone: "We're under intense pressure... we have to be super careful about our messaging and what we're stating...not useful to speculate about things like integration (of DNA from reverse transcribed RNA) “
BTW Dr. Nagase, concerning our earlier comments on the reverse transcription concern, I just saw this substack about a recent journal article: https://syedhaider.substack.com/p/more-proof-mrna-shots-edit-human
It discusses the following:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.02.10.527906v1.full
Maybe of interest for a future breakdown as well... sharing in case it hasn't come your way yet.
Malone states his concern clearly here, betraying what I think is an inordinate deference to the Establishment. He is cautioning about speculation which will be used against vaxxx critics by the Establishment. In my view, the message should have been the vaxxx should not have been released until there was certainty reverse transcription would NOT occur:
Dr. Malone: "We're under intense pressure... we have to be super careful about our messaging and what we're stating...not useful to speculate about things like integration (of DNA from reverse transcribed RNA) “
What do I think? I know that Malone is an Intelligence Industrial Complex asset that has done much harm.
He is a 🐍
Another point about Malone: He is a consultant and advocate for a COVID vaxx produced in India, apparently not an mRNA one. Malone is not in any way an anti-vaxxer nor even strong vaxxx critic. I listened to his very technical pitch for the India vaxxx in which he mentions the aluminum adjuvant suspected by anti-vaxxxers as being a major problem. According to Del Bigtree and his lawyers, the CDC has admitted they have never tested this adjuvant for safety in human, but only in rats fed it orally, certainly not equivalent to injection. Supposedly, Bigtree erroneously labelled Malone in a broadcast an anti-vaxxer because of his criticism of the mRNA covid vaxxxes. Malone refused to ever appear with Bigtree again.
HOWEVER, in spite of all this it is erroneous to jump to the conclusion he is CONTROLLED OPPOSITION. Of course, that is possible, but without evidence it is better to consider him a vaccinologist who refuses to deny clear safety signals. More vaccinologists should be encouraged to follow suit.
Powerful! Thank you
I deem dr Peterson to be a pompous fool (always did, but I'm now past the age of listening to deepities in moral or "life-artsy" promulgations by authority figures) who may be right on some issues some of the time. Am I prejudiced? Maybe. And maybe prejudice is fruitful - so as not to have my time stolen.
Whereas your analysis (in slow time...) of possible implications, ramifications and discrepancies of Peterson's Byzantine utterances is extremely useful, dr. Nagase - teaching us HOW to think and speak.