False Flags in the Freedom Community?

Controlled Op? or Psy Op?

Thank you again dear readers for your patience. It has been over a month since my last post, and with so much going on, I haven’t kept up with science or legal research. What I have noticed is the flood of “Must See” videos and articles circulating through the freedom networks. It made me question whether or not a portion of that flood of “Too Much Information” is in fact intended to manipulate, divert or subvert the Truth and Freedom movement.

Here’s one example from August the 1st 2023, where a “Discrepancy” led me to take the time to do an “Analysis”.

The social media post from August 1st, that raised a “Red Flag” for me circulated widely across Freedom groups on both signal and telegram.

Here is one of the first articles providing details on this supposed “Win”.

https://www.jccf.ca/alberta-court-strikes-down-public-health-orders-that-violated-charter-freedoms/?fbclid=IwAR2cUWAZhirZ7G5QxfHchgHwzt0-0-nEUgsu0aTkNGPS3qls1Q8DAlUEFp0

I’ll quote the first paragraph of the article in its entirety.

• “CALGARY, ALBERTA: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is pleased with the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta’s decision to invalidate the public health orders of Dr. Deena Hinshaw, Chief Medical Officer of Health (CMOH), in Ingram v. Alberta. The court struck down these lockdown measures because they were effectively issued by Cabinet rather than by the CMOH.”

So the court striking down a lockdown by a political cabinet while endorsing one by a Chief Medical Officer is a legal “win”?

Did the court actually endorse a violation of human rights?

The last sentence of the 3rd paragraph says:

• “…Justice Barbara Romaine nevertheless concluded that lockdowns were justified violations of Charter freedoms because they produced more good than harm.”

It looks like the judge did endorse violations of human rights.

So why is the message “We Won!” being circulated?

Is this a false flag?

How did they do it?

---

Analysis Questions:

1. Where did this “We Won” message come from?

   1. Freedom4Canada.com

   2. Jeff Rath (A lawyer)

   3. JCCF ( Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms - a group of lawyers)

   4. All of the Above
      

2. How did this message get so widely circulated through the freedom community?
   

3. What is the purpose for circulating this narrative?

---

The answer to the first question appears to be “d. All of the Above”

The message “We Won!” seems to have originated from groups representing lawyers.

My previous more detailed thoughts on lawyers in Canada is here:

One of the most important points in the above article about Laws in Canada is the foundational question:

“What is a Canadian Lawyer?”

• (A Canadian Lawyer is a person with an Oath to the Bar.)

Why is this important? Specifically why is the Oath to the Bar so critical?

---

(Bill Gates?) and (false) Oaths

A professional’s oath gives people an indication of that person’s loyalties, and who she or he is really working for.

For example, if all Canadian doctors swore an oath to Bill Gates, then that’s a pretty good indication that he or she is NOT working for people’s health and well being.

And honestly, I have to wonder if the doctors I named in:

actually do swear an oath to Bill Gates. I have a hard time explaining any of their medical actions and the subsequent deaths of their patients under the Hippocratic Oath. (Does Alberta Health Services have some secret oath that I missed out on?)

---

Question #2:

How did this message get so widely circulated through the freedom community?

• Social media forwards.

Unfortunately the frenzy mentality in social media leads to a lot of material being shared without being verified. But this leads to the question:

Was it an “Honest” mistake?

Did someone misnterpret:

• “The court struck down these lockdown measures because they were effectively issued by Cabinet rather than by the CMOH.”

AND

• “…Justice Barbara Romaine nevertheless concluded that lockdowns were justified violations of Charter freedoms because they produced more good than harm.”

Is it humanly possible to misinterpret those statements as

“WE WON!”?!

Then after misinterpreting the court case, taking the time to make a poster saying: “WE WON!”

AND

Circulate it everywhere across freedom channels???!!!???

Does this make any sense?

---

Or is there something more SINISTER?

Let’s look at the final question #3:

• What is the purpose for circulating this narrative?

What happens when people who just read the headlines see the message:

“WE WON!”

If you ask me, it makes people complacent.

Freedom Fighters might be fooled into thinking, “WE WON!” and “The lawyers have won our freedoms back! Yay!” Thinking that everything’s returned to normal, people ready to stand up for freedom then go back to business as usual.

But did we actually win anything?

---

To Summarize:

Going back to Question #1:

Where did this “We Won” message come from?

• Likely originated from Lawyers

What are lawyers?

• People with an oath to the Bar

What is an Oath?

• Well I don’t know what all the Barristers and Solicitor’s oaths are in Canada, since it seems that every province has a different one.

• But I do know what false Oaths are, and I did a speech about it last year in Vancouver :

So

1. A message originating from people with false oaths

2. Circulating a headline that is false (We didn’t win anything)

3. That has the effect of creating complacency and inaction in the freedom movement.¹

To me that all ads up to a psychological operation designed to diffuse the Truth and Freedom movement.

Thank you all for keeping your minds sharp and thoughts reasoned.

---

POSTSCRIPT

I know many in the Freedom community of Calgary to be genuine freedom fighters. I’ve just heard that a few are upset and feeling down after reading this article. I am very sorry for the hard workers within the freedom community who put their heart and souls into fighting this case only to be betrayed and used as psy ops by lawyers. Betrayal hurts. I did a speech about it in Rimbey. It hurt when one of the daughters of the patients I saved wrote a complaint, saying that I refused to take a dirty meal tray and that her mother complained the ivermectin was bitter.

True hearted freedom fighters being betrayed by “The Law” probably hurts even worse. I’ve seen many true freedom fighters pour their time, love and energy into fighting for justice only to be deceived. The lawyer for one of the Coutts 4, still in jail after entrapment by the RCMP, told family they would have to raise another $200,000 to take their son’s case to trial. This is after they already paid this lawyer $300,000. That’s 1/2 a million dollars to fight a civil rights case! Why is he squeezing the family? He’d get generously paid fighting probono on one of the biggest civil rights cases in Alberta. I can’t imagine how big the settlement would be. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Any lawyer fighting the biggest human rights cases in Canadian history who asks the freedom movement for money is not fighting for humanity. They’re financially draining those who are challenging the wrongdoings of the crown.

Laws in Canada

Please find the courage to get back up after betrayal. It is the hardest injury to recover from. I’ve experienced it from my profession, my wife and even within the freedom movement. The only guaranteed loss is giving up. The only choice with a chance of winning is to fight for our lives and the lives of others.

---

POSTSCRIPT 2

I’ve been told that “Freedom Lawyers” donated thousands of dollars of ProBono work to our cause for Truth and Freedom.

Here’s my “hour(s)” of Pro Bono legal work that I’m donating (again) to all lawyers in Canada.

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

• Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

• Article 20: 1)Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

• Article 23: 1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

When a “Lawyer” goes to court this would be the “exchange”:

• “Your honour, what body law has higher standing?

  • The Public Health Act and the Canadian Charter of Rights?

    • OR

  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, brought into legal force by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1976?”

• Judge: (if she / he tries to avoid the question, it has to be repeated 3 times after which the judge either has to answer or step down.)

  • The only correct answer is that the Universal Declaration has higher standing.

• “Your honour, the mandates, whether they come from cabinet or the Medical Health Officer herself, both constitute a violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Therefore all vaccination mandates and lockdowns are illegal.”

1 HOUR OF RESEARCH.

1 PAGE OF ARGUMENT.

10 MINUTES OF VERBAL EXCHANGE IN COURT.

THE END.

---

• 3 billable hours? Maybe 10 billable hours pro bono if we’re being generous?

“If it’s so simple Dr. Nagase why don’t YOU do it?”

Well I found out twice in 2022, the first time after being assaulted and jailed for 3 hours in a North Vancouver courthouse without charge; and then again after being threatened with assault and confinement in a Cardston Alberta court house a few months later, I found that IN CANADA, a man may not stand on behalf of another unless they are a member of the “Law Society” e.g. provincial bar.

That’s right. The only people allowed to speak on behalf of others in Canada have to be members of a “cabal” otherwise known as a “Law Society”.

Thankfully we still have the right to stand for ourselves here in Canada. This is why my lawsuit against the Supreme Court of BC, has attracted the attention of the Crown. The Attorney General of British Columbia is trying to strike my case of restitution for harm against my children before it is even heard - a clear obstruction of justice.

Their excuse?

• Judicial “Immunity”.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/8Ubd034KGgIA/

When a case actually brings genuine threat of accountability against wrongdoers, the Crown gets involved with surprising speed.

Legal cases that present no meaningful accountability, meanwhile, seem to be given passage to slowly inch their way through the system for our continued “hope and distraction”.

A real fight gets the Crown’s immediate attention and pushback, while “False Fights” are advertised for our hopes and entertainment without Attorney General resistance.

---

POSTSCRIPT 3

If you scroll down towards the bottom of the comments, Attorney Jeff Rath has left links to his substack on my article.

I encourage readers to read his side of the story as the attorney involved with the case above.

I’ve included a screenshot of the comments to save the scrolling for those who need the quick version fast.

So what was I talking about at this “Secret” meeting of healthcare workers?

The Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons committed crimes.

Attorney Jeff Rath’s recommended solution was to “Elect a new board”

Give an example of the Alberta College of Physicians committing a crime.

The College violated the Canadian Human Rights act first passed in 1977.

“Prohibited grounds of discrimination

• 3 (1) For all purposes of this Act, the prohibited grounds of discrimination are race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, genetic characteristics, disability and conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered.”

The Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons Restricted my practice so that I am not allowed to see any patients with covid or SUSPECTED covid. This would force me to discriminate against patients on a prohibited grounds for discrimination.

I detail this in my article “Laws in Canada”

But if you click the first button link that used to show my restrictions, it goes to a blank page.

Yes that’s right! Sometime after June 13, 2023, the College of physicians and surgeons of Alberta CHANGED their restrictions on me to REMOVE the part that VIOLATED the Canadian Human Rights Act.

(without telling me)

I have been out of work for almost 2 years thinking that the COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ALBERTA restricted me from taking care of ER patients with abdominal pains (because it might be covid). Sometime in the past 2 months they quietly deleted the part that would make them criminals and allow me to be an ER doctor again.

https://web.archive.org/web/20211226213245/https://search.cpsa.ca/PhysicianProfile?e=9472eac0-db55-45b1-8e61-36ea066286ea&i=0

In fact, the CPSA has been quietly changing my restrictions without informing me throughout the past 2 years.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230412220143/https://search.cpsa.ca/PhysicianProfile?e=9472eac0-db55-45b1-8e61-36ea066286ea&i=0

Attorney Jeff Rath’s solution to the College of Physicians and Surgeons hiding evidence of criminality after committing crimes that resulted in unemployment, Emergency Room Closures, and UNTOLD PATIENT DEATHS, is to…

Elect a new board?!!!

1. Some in the Freedom movement experience the opposite effect. When propaganda is exposed, we get even more motivation to win.