Here we will look at how the mRNA sequences for pfizer and moderna’s COVID'-19 injection can cause problems with the human gene Line-1.
First let’s look at the code of Line-1:
(Sequence taken from the national library of medicine - where you can find multiple versions and fragments of LINE-1. I picked the longest version, as that’s least likely to have missing parts that were cropped during isolation of the gene. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Human+LINE1)
I’d paste the whole thing but the part we’re interested is at the end.
6001 accctaaaac ttagagtata ataaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaa
6001 isn’t the year yet, it’s the base pair number. (Each group is 10 base pairs, except the last batch in this cut and paste which is 9.) The start of the gene is base pair 1, and it goes all the way to base pair 6059 for the gene Line-1. (A group of 3 base pairs forms a codon which can code for an amino acid. Chain a bunch of amino acids together and voila! A protein!)
So what’s so particular about the end of Line-1?
We have 37 “a” ’s in a row. Why is that important? Because the moderna and pfizer mRNA injections for COVID have something very similar.
(a stands for adenine in DNA. t stands for thymine, g is guanine, and c is cytosine For a short explanation of DNA and RNA please check out Dr. Syed Haider’s substack where one of my dear reader’s found the article that I needed to complete this one:)
If I had finished this article earlier, I would have been missing this key piece, so thank you College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, for delaying my article but making it better in the process!
So back to the Human Gene Line-1, it makes up 17-20% of the Human Genome.
Now if we look at Moderna’s sequence here:
It ends with:
100 “a” ’s followed by “ucuag”.
And then Pfizer’s mRNA for COVID-19:
70 “a” ’s preceeded by “gcauaugac”. (“u” in the moderna and pfizer isn’t true uracil - a nucleotide component that makes up RNA. It is methyl pseudo uracil, an artificial modified version made to prevent cells from destroying the spike protein mRNA.)
What’s the problem?
Well if either the pfizer or moderna versions of the spike protein mRNA are reverse transcribed, then that long chain of “a” ’s will turn into a long chain of “t” ‘s that would base pair (attach) to any gene with a long tail of “a” ‘s — like Line-1.
AND there’s many copies of Line-1 throughout the human genome.
So 17-20% of the human genome could be targeted because pfizer and moderna put a long tail of “a” ’s on the ends of their mRNA?
That’s exactly what I was thinking…
So why didn’t you tell us 5 days ago? (Time is Nucleotide!)
Well, I wasn’t quite sure. I had my suspicions, but no scientific article that could quite make those suspicions suspiciously suspect. That’s when the study found by one of my readers in Dr. Sayed Haider’s substack baked the cake.
Now thanks to this fresh study by Rudolf Jaenisch and Liguo Zhang, I had evidence the proteins made by the Line-1 gene had an affinity for Poly-a — that is the long chains of “a” ‘s, coincidentally also found in Moderna’s and Pfizer’s COVID mRNA injections. These Poly-a’s are also in the Line-1 gene itself. When a Line-1 mRNA with a long Poly-a is in the cytoplasm (outside the nucleus) the L1ORF2p proteins made by Line-1 preferentially bind to the poly-A stretch at the end of the LINE1 mRNA, AND CARRY IT INTO THE NUCLEUS!
Why is that bad?
Because what happens if L1ORF2p proteins that bind to the Poly-a stick to the long stretch of “a” 's in the Pfizer and Moderna Spike Protein mRNA?
AND THEN CARRY THAT INTO THE NUCLEUS?!?
The Pfizer and Moderna spike protein mRNA’s already resist breakdown within the cytoplasm because of their engineered 5’ Cap and their Methyl pseudo uracil nucleotides resist exonucleases. They already “live” longer than natural mRNA’s.
Now there’s a mechanism (Line-1 ORF1 and ORF2 proteins) to take them into the nucleus?
AND that mechanism has a reverse transcriptase AND an endonuclease to insert it into DNA?
But there’s something else suspicious!
There’s a Discrepancy! (in the study)
In the February 13th article about Line-1 and Poly-a, they find that the SARS-CoV-2 virus likes to make Poly-a tails as well. They found the virus had Poly-a tails on its Nucleocapsid mRNA and that it integrated into the DNA of cells infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Then they did another experiment where they took just the mRNA for the nucleocapsid and transfected it into cells. They didn’t use the whole virus as would be the case in an infection. What they found was transfection did not result in DNA integration of viral genes. (Insertion of virus genes into the DNA)
That’s great news right?
Transfection is what happens when you take Pfizer or Moderna’s COVID-19 injection! Lipid nanoparticles “transfect” your cells with Spike protein mRNA. They don’t infect your cells with SARS-CoV-2 like you’d get from standing too close to someone without a mask…right? (So this experiment showed that a transfection like getting an mRNA injection didn’t alter DNA right?)
The nucleocapsid mRNA the authors used for transfection had a short 25 base pair Poly-a.
The 70 base pair Poly-a in moderna
the 100 base pair Poly-a in pfizer.
This study’s authors don’t go into how long the Poly-a’s are in a virus infection, but the original Wuhan strain it looks like it has a 33 base pair Poly-a tail.
They came to the conclusion that transfection didn’t cause viral genes to get integrated into a cell’s DNA whereas an infection with SARS-CoV-2 did?
Are they trying to say the virus changes the DNA more than a “transfection vaccine” using mRNA?
But the Poly-a tail they used in their transfection experiment was 25% SHORTER than the Poly-a tail in the SARS-CoV-2 virus experiment!
What’s even worse is that the “transfection” Poly-a tail is 32% shorter than Line-1’s “natural” Poly-a tail, and 75% shorter than the Pfizer Spike Protein Poly-a tail.
What is wrong with them?
Aren’t they comparing Apples to Bicycles?
Time is Nucleotide!
Why do an OK experiment, when for the same amount of time and nucleotide you could do a TITANIC experiment?
Forget about nucleocapsid protein. Forget about someone’s donated “pUC57-2019-ncov plasmid, a kind gift from Christine A. Roden from the Amy S. Gladfelter laboratory (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)”.
GO TO A VACCINE CLINIC AND “BORROW” SOME Pfizer and Moderna mRNA!
You know the ones with 100 base pair and 70 base pair Poly-a TAILS?
What are they afraid of?
Growing spike proteins in a dish?
They know how to wear gloves right?
They know how to work under a biohazard hood right?
It does not make sense to do a pancake mix experiment when for the same time and $ they could have done the Pompeii of all experiments.
We found the Discrepancy, Now the Analysis!
The clue. The very suspicious clue is the name of one of the study’s authors, “Rudolf Jaenisch”.
I don’t know the guy. I’ve never met him. I’m thinking he’s a great guy who knows a thing or two about cell biology.
So why the suspicion?
Do I think a serious cell biologist like him is afraid of spike proteins?
Not really. I think “Rudolf Jaenisch” might be afraid of a different kind of spike. The kind of lead spike that’s attached to a brass casing with flammable powder.
What? First cell biology now JFK?
Let me explain.
The only reason I know the name “Rudolf Jaenisch” is because Dr. Robert Malone trash talked him during an interview I did in November 2021.
Watch the video:
9:45 Dr. Malone: "I work closely with government."
10:43 Dr. Malone: "I was alerted by a CIA officer..."
40:30 Dr. Nagase: Backstory.
45:30 Dr. Nagase: Cancer and reverse transcriptase
47:03 Dr. Malone: drops off call
57.53 Dr. Malone: comes back cautioning against speculating about reverse transcriptase.
58:30 Dr. Malone: "We're under intense pressure... we have to be super careful about our messenging and what we're stating...not useful to speculate about things like integration (of DNA from reverse transcribed RNA)
59:26 Malone: "I really think one does need to be a little cautious about interpreting some of these papers like the PNAS paper regarding reverse transcriptase by Rudy Jaenisch, WHO HAS A MULTI DECADE HISTORY OF OVER INTERPRETING RETRO VIROLOGY AND PUBLISHING IRREPRODUCIBLE FINDINGS. So that's my parting gentle comment is that we do have to be really careful not to provide opportunities for our haters to attack us."
Why is the “inventor of mRNA technology” trashing another cell biologist?
From the Video:
Works closely with government?
Was “alerted by a CIA officer” about Wuhan?
Trash Talks his Cell Biology buddy Rudolf Jaenisch?
Maybe Rudolf Jaenisch could have done the experiment with the COVID mRNA injections instead of donated nucleocapsid RNA. (Maybe he did do the same experiment with Pfizer and Moderna)
But to save his life, and not end up like JFK, he didn’t publish it.
Logical Surprises is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Post Script: If it indeed was the case that Spike protein mRNA was deliberately gene edited into people, theoretically it would be possible to do the reverse. That is gene edit it out of people. The question then would be what do we gene edit it out with?
My first idea was use Line-1 itself to “Edit Out” spike protein genes. But Line-1 itself isn’t 100% benign, as it has been thought to have a role sometimes in cancers. However, an extra copy of “natural” Line-1 might be better than an unnatural copy of "spike protein”.
Post Post Script: You can hear Dr. Malone in the back ground at 1:23 trying to talk over Dr. Weismann because he’s getting into “Uncomfortable” territory. (fyi, Dr. Weismann is way smarter than me.)
Suggestion for Dr Nagase: When giving public statements which are recorded, instead of saying "College of Physicians ", name each person who makes up the College of Physicians. (Who are these SOBs?) Don't let them hide behind the Institutional name (College of Physicians), which is used as intimidation. Make each member of the College of Physicians accountable!
Dr Nagase, how about mitochondrial DNA?