I'd like to highlight how philosophical is this article as opposed to 99% of what we're seeing which are those talking about people or describing events. They're limiting themselves to being 'masters of the obvious'. See, he's more describing how to think instead of merely describing what's going on. He could be saying, "That person is a sociopath" or "this insane behavior is sociopathic' but instead it's, "how to recognize a sociopath.'
He's giving you useful survival information you can put to use in all circumstances. When someone talks about other people they're bringing value to themselves, 'look how much better I am.' When they talk about events, they're saying, 'look how much more smart, aware and virtuous I am, but this article is instead giving you value, something you can put to use. This is the big difference in how to consume content. Can you actually tell when someone is taking value as opposed to giving it?
Learn how to recognize when an article is philosophical and when it's not. It's good to talk about people and events spread awareness, sure, but it's not supposed to stop there. It's always to lead to discussing philosophical ideas. That's the only area which brings actual value and the only place you ought to give your attention to. You don't have ideas? That's fine, you don't need to have ideas, go to where ideas are being discussed. I estimate 99% is non-philosophical so that means you'll have to do a lot of filtering!
'Weak minds discuss people, average minds discuss events, and only strong minds discuss ideas.' Socrates
Dr. Nagase was right about the nanotechnology biosensor devices he found in the Covid-19 modified mRNA Gene Therapy platform injections.
These are crimes of warrantless search and seizure of our biometrics via the embedded nanotechnology biosensors in the masks, tests and jabs via the Internet of Bio-Nano Things and the WBAN (Wireless Body Area Network IEEE802.15.6 in the Terahertz Band.) It seems likely that this topic has resulted in the Gag Order against him.
Sociopath? Or just an erratic personality? Or AI generated?
In the US I believe they used the term 'amnesty'. So it sounds like a coordinated movement. And they changed the strategy.
And I noticed however, the first group of the jabbed who came out in the public after sustaining the injuries were severely ridiculed. (Hence I left my beloved language learning site Duolingo which was featured on the Highwire episode)
For me it appears to highlight the theme of "the victim becomes the perpetuator".
And "the saviour becomes the perpetuator". (Vise versa)
At this level of social injustice, the person has to fully accept what they have done and take the responsibility, otherwise any hope for the redemption will escape.
Thank you for this contribution, Daniel Nagase MD. I agree that the sole saving grace for those who 'followed the science' (without understanding it) is to accept and allow feelings of shame over one's utter ignorance, instead of projecting responsibilty unto others.
Immediate and clear rebuttals, both in fact (if possible) or citation of basic human rights. If they display a force posture, flee. If you have an equal force, bring the noise. Wink. Cheers!
I agree. We have to counter on reason and not just emotion. They didn't research, well that's not an excuse. They tried to kill us from their forcing the vx so it's a tad difficult to feel sorry for them.
I don't know who or what is 'doing an Emily* on us' here, but I try to look at it (or ignore it, ifonly to keep sane) with an unsentimental eye. Which can be hard when dealing with relatives/friends/'friend', but I see no way around it, since some of them shamelessly bacame bullies overnight.
If A.I. it is attempting to voice a resolution for several aggregated perceived "issues" at once-a quick fix beta-panacea. If an erratic personality, sadly, I would posit they are attempting to resolve in fashion that mimics the holistic voice of hindsight, plus remorse. Both were created by sociopaths - roughly. Cheers!
Not formally mate - but I had many of the (now typical sounding) horrific abuses committed against me over the years. I had to fight a gaggle of state sponsored socio/psychopathic criminals simply to make it to year 18 (now 45). Many budding young sociopaths were left to their druthers - they needed no additional crafting. I also noted many folks finding their way in via simple carrot and stick treatments. The architects gain a tangible foothold in their minds and created enough of a forced bond so that they coalesced in some fashion, and parroted the basics when in group settings. A kind of "averaging" to achieve demographic success for the abusers? I know nothing! ;)
The ridicule of 'antivaxxers' started earlier. People were being encouraged to be vigilante abusive to parents of kids with autism. There were even many #actuallyautistic accounts adding to that - Don't be discriminatory towards 'neurodiversity' - autism is just a beautiful variation of normal - was the message that seemed to be being pushed. Ridicule links to vaccinations and ridicule anyone suggesting that the epidemic increase in autism was at all unusual or even a problem rather than a 'blessing of neurodiversity'. Parents of kids with autism were accused of all sorts of negative things if they were trying to advocate for change in policies.
Regarding why would a real woman put up with online abuse for more than half a second? Because many females are raised to be polite and courteous . . . and put up with abuse. There also seems to be a compulsion to respond associated with increased dopamine from all the stimulation of social media. I had to learn to make myself walk away without even any last comment because true trolls or shills will always go for another reply. Sadistic trolls are a real internet thing - people get their dopamine jollies by trying to get a reaction from other people.
*Edit - the 'one' instead of an "I" is really weird. I have never seen anyone type like that, I can think of zero examples of that. Good eye, and yes that is suspicious. Definitely some narratives are fake accounts and it is hard to know.
Since Emily what's her name called for forgiveness (in the course of 2021 of 2022), without for once casting a glance in the mirror - let alone detecting a tyrant there [I owe this meme to a real and nuanced freedom fighter, @Tessa Lena] - I am acutely aware of this cop-out.
Yesterday I attended the last rites in honour of a young niece, who suffered from a brain tumor that accelerated rapidly. No mention was made of 'injections' and other outlandish topics. I expect many such funerals to occur over the next years - and I do not look forwars to those. Even if the majority of friends & next-of-kin are well-meaning, loving peaople (besides being damnably foolish), I still don't find it in me to call them out for the sociopaths they either are or serve.
However, it's fair to say that such ceremonies have a slightly (yet monstrously) sociopathic gloss to them. Once again, those in the know are condemned to silence. Not in the name of any sort of truth - on the contrary! - but in the name of a courtesy of sorts. Obsolete, and yet natural: that's the burden of us being 'social animals' - and the article you're quoting tramples on this truth by tacitly attributing the sorrows of the injectees [real in themselves] to us ("neo-nazis", "the far right", etc]. Even the natural desire to mourn is denied to us - watered down at least, normalized, memory-holed...
If you didn’t try to warn people, you are part of the problem. In a lot of cases where we did our due diligence, the old saying comes into play that you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make them drink. If you failed to warn people then you need to take a good long look in the mirror and ask yourself if you could be a sociopath or another word for it is “Malthusian.” Do you really give a rat’s @$$ for anyone but yourself?
“It's reading endless detox protocols and wondering IF they truly work or IF they too are part of the bs, because how would we ever know as there is no longterm proof“
Besides the boo hoo stories that were circulating last week the comment on proof did it for me. Now she’s worried about proof? It felt manipulative and coordinated.
No sane rational person rages against those who took the vaxx for work or out of fear. Those who are/were in an “authority position” that pushed and coerced is another story.
The people who got them saw what was being done to the people refusing them who were exercising autonomy. They could have advocated by leveraging their supposed need to get them by saying they would not take them until any coercive or intrusive measures were removed against all people. It was wrong. Nothing makes it right or understandable.
They had zero concern for us because, if anything, we were dirty vermin in their eyes.
Sociopaths truly think the people they abuse deserve what they dish out. My ex-husband actually said my Irish and Blackfoot ancestors were weak and thus had their democidal attacks coming.
The Great Euthanizers are already onto phases 2,3,4,5,6,...
There is a systematic worldwide initiative to censor misinformation and disinformation by imposing a life sentence based on the amorphous charge of engaging in a hate crime.
The US government just allocated $1 billion in its most recent budget for gain of function research on H5N1 and the manufacturing vaccines for it. The mortality rate of this "lower respiratory" illness is 15% vs 1-3% for the "upper respiratory" Covid illness.
The Great Euthanizers are a public-private partnership with $10 trillion at their disposal and hundreds of issue specific NGO's as tentacles to brainwash, sterilize, and euthanize us.
Like all battle fields the injuries, bodies, and lies are piling up but we must carry on the fight understanding every step of the way, " that without God I can't but without me He won't.
We always need to be encouraging each other with the Truth and Good solutions to the crises in queue and generated by The Great Euthanizers.
Along the line of vaccines, see neurological adverse events in children under age of 2 associated with vaccinations: https://accscience.com/journal/AN/articles/online_first/1288 - is it easier to discredit those who point out flaws than to test for possible manufacturing contaminates like endotoxins?
I just think that our common senses are now in hyper drive to detect deepfake generated realty. Our senses are on high alert having observed the casualties of war and we know they are not finished. We cannot afford to let our guard down under any circumstances. Perception and response in defense is physical, mental and spiritual. Discernment increases based upon our common experiences to ascertain what is genuine or contrived. In the end; no deals.
I'd like to highlight how philosophical is this article as opposed to 99% of what we're seeing which are those talking about people or describing events. They're limiting themselves to being 'masters of the obvious'. See, he's more describing how to think instead of merely describing what's going on. He could be saying, "That person is a sociopath" or "this insane behavior is sociopathic' but instead it's, "how to recognize a sociopath.'
He's giving you useful survival information you can put to use in all circumstances. When someone talks about other people they're bringing value to themselves, 'look how much better I am.' When they talk about events, they're saying, 'look how much more smart, aware and virtuous I am, but this article is instead giving you value, something you can put to use. This is the big difference in how to consume content. Can you actually tell when someone is taking value as opposed to giving it?
Learn how to recognize when an article is philosophical and when it's not. It's good to talk about people and events spread awareness, sure, but it's not supposed to stop there. It's always to lead to discussing philosophical ideas. That's the only area which brings actual value and the only place you ought to give your attention to. You don't have ideas? That's fine, you don't need to have ideas, go to where ideas are being discussed. I estimate 99% is non-philosophical so that means you'll have to do a lot of filtering!
'Weak minds discuss people, average minds discuss events, and only strong minds discuss ideas.' Socrates
Thank you!
Dr. Nagase was right about the nanotechnology biosensor devices he found in the Covid-19 modified mRNA Gene Therapy platform injections.
These are crimes of warrantless search and seizure of our biometrics via the embedded nanotechnology biosensors in the masks, tests and jabs via the Internet of Bio-Nano Things and the WBAN (Wireless Body Area Network IEEE802.15.6 in the Terahertz Band.) It seems likely that this topic has resulted in the Gag Order against him.
https://odysee.com/@psinergy:f?view=content
https://outraged.substack.com/p/agenda-2030-is-about-nanotechnology?publication_id=1087020&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=8h23m&utm_medium=email
https://odysee.com/@psinergy:f/yetiswrednoses:d
Sociopath? Or just an erratic personality? Or AI generated?
In the US I believe they used the term 'amnesty'. So it sounds like a coordinated movement. And they changed the strategy.
And I noticed however, the first group of the jabbed who came out in the public after sustaining the injuries were severely ridiculed. (Hence I left my beloved language learning site Duolingo which was featured on the Highwire episode)
For me it appears to highlight the theme of "the victim becomes the perpetuator".
And "the saviour becomes the perpetuator". (Vise versa)
At this level of social injustice, the person has to fully accept what they have done and take the responsibility, otherwise any hope for the redemption will escape.
well said
Thank you for this contribution, Daniel Nagase MD. I agree that the sole saving grace for those who 'followed the science' (without understanding it) is to accept and allow feelings of shame over one's utter ignorance, instead of projecting responsibilty unto others.
🎯🔥
Trouble is, I do.
So... how to deal with their pronouncements?
Immediate and clear rebuttals, both in fact (if possible) or citation of basic human rights. If they display a force posture, flee. If you have an equal force, bring the noise. Wink. Cheers!
I agree. We have to counter on reason and not just emotion. They didn't research, well that's not an excuse. They tried to kill us from their forcing the vx so it's a tad difficult to feel sorry for them.
I don't know who or what is 'doing an Emily* on us' here, but I try to look at it (or ignore it, ifonly to keep sane) with an unsentimental eye. Which can be hard when dealing with relatives/friends/'friend', but I see no way around it, since some of them shamelessly bacame bullies overnight.
*Emily Osterhaus: in The Atlantic, I think.
Found it [plus comment that makes sense]
Thanks to Tessa Lena [inventress of the priceless term 'wobbly folk']
https://tessa.substack.com/p/emily-oster-the-broken-child-the
Question authority
....with the exception of yourself!
Thank you, Ty, agree.
And then what?
Will they never talk again? Are they that unreachable? (many are, I know...)
https://outraged.substack.com/p/nanotechnology-murder?utm_medium=reader2
If A.I. it is attempting to voice a resolution for several aggregated perceived "issues" at once-a quick fix beta-panacea. If an erratic personality, sadly, I would posit they are attempting to resolve in fashion that mimics the holistic voice of hindsight, plus remorse. Both were created by sociopaths - roughly. Cheers!
I see you probably haven't worked in mental health or alike?
Aha so we all could be created by sociopaths them :-P
Not formally mate - but I had many of the (now typical sounding) horrific abuses committed against me over the years. I had to fight a gaggle of state sponsored socio/psychopathic criminals simply to make it to year 18 (now 45). Many budding young sociopaths were left to their druthers - they needed no additional crafting. I also noted many folks finding their way in via simple carrot and stick treatments. The architects gain a tangible foothold in their minds and created enough of a forced bond so that they coalesced in some fashion, and parroted the basics when in group settings. A kind of "averaging" to achieve demographic success for the abusers? I know nothing! ;)
How exciting! The programming is still running there. Good luck w your journey. Cheerio.
Thank you, Daniel. Wonderful article.
The ridicule of 'antivaxxers' started earlier. People were being encouraged to be vigilante abusive to parents of kids with autism. There were even many #actuallyautistic accounts adding to that - Don't be discriminatory towards 'neurodiversity' - autism is just a beautiful variation of normal - was the message that seemed to be being pushed. Ridicule links to vaccinations and ridicule anyone suggesting that the epidemic increase in autism was at all unusual or even a problem rather than a 'blessing of neurodiversity'. Parents of kids with autism were accused of all sorts of negative things if they were trying to advocate for change in policies.
Regarding why would a real woman put up with online abuse for more than half a second? Because many females are raised to be polite and courteous . . . and put up with abuse. There also seems to be a compulsion to respond associated with increased dopamine from all the stimulation of social media. I had to learn to make myself walk away without even any last comment because true trolls or shills will always go for another reply. Sadistic trolls are a real internet thing - people get their dopamine jollies by trying to get a reaction from other people.
*Edit - the 'one' instead of an "I" is really weird. I have never seen anyone type like that, I can think of zero examples of that. Good eye, and yes that is suspicious. Definitely some narratives are fake accounts and it is hard to know.
Since Emily what's her name called for forgiveness (in the course of 2021 of 2022), without for once casting a glance in the mirror - let alone detecting a tyrant there [I owe this meme to a real and nuanced freedom fighter, @Tessa Lena] - I am acutely aware of this cop-out.
Yesterday I attended the last rites in honour of a young niece, who suffered from a brain tumor that accelerated rapidly. No mention was made of 'injections' and other outlandish topics. I expect many such funerals to occur over the next years - and I do not look forwars to those. Even if the majority of friends & next-of-kin are well-meaning, loving peaople (besides being damnably foolish), I still don't find it in me to call them out for the sociopaths they either are or serve.
However, it's fair to say that such ceremonies have a slightly (yet monstrously) sociopathic gloss to them. Once again, those in the know are condemned to silence. Not in the name of any sort of truth - on the contrary! - but in the name of a courtesy of sorts. Obsolete, and yet natural: that's the burden of us being 'social animals' - and the article you're quoting tramples on this truth by tacitly attributing the sorrows of the injectees [real in themselves] to us ("neo-nazis", "the far right", etc]. Even the natural desire to mourn is denied to us - watered down at least, normalized, memory-holed...
If you didn’t try to warn people, you are part of the problem. In a lot of cases where we did our due diligence, the old saying comes into play that you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make them drink. If you failed to warn people then you need to take a good long look in the mirror and ask yourself if you could be a sociopath or another word for it is “Malthusian.” Do you really give a rat’s @$$ for anyone but yourself?
Hello Daniel, please can you get in touch with me. Great article btw, sobering.
I look forward to you interviewing this hero Dr.
I read this post a week ago and thought exactly the same thing as you. Kudos to you for summarizing it so well
“It's reading endless detox protocols and wondering IF they truly work or IF they too are part of the bs, because how would we ever know as there is no longterm proof“
Besides the boo hoo stories that were circulating last week the comment on proof did it for me. Now she’s worried about proof? It felt manipulative and coordinated.
No sane rational person rages against those who took the vaxx for work or out of fear. Those who are/were in an “authority position” that pushed and coerced is another story.
Yea … That quote hit a nerve w me too
“No long term proof” !!!! What ?!?
She didn’t care about the long term proof of the EUA fresh-off-the-press vax … so when exactly did that LONG TERM PROOF thing start to matter ?
The people who got them saw what was being done to the people refusing them who were exercising autonomy. They could have advocated by leveraging their supposed need to get them by saying they would not take them until any coercive or intrusive measures were removed against all people. It was wrong. Nothing makes it right or understandable.
They had zero concern for us because, if anything, we were dirty vermin in their eyes.
Sociopaths truly think the people they abuse deserve what they dish out. My ex-husband actually said my Irish and Blackfoot ancestors were weak and thus had their democidal attacks coming.
what a heartbreaking mentality
Yes. He’s a study in pathology and on his 5th wife.
Poor Bonnie…whose book deal went through DURING covid and whose winery stayed open and functioning DURING covid. Oh boo hoo!
Thanks for pointing this out. Playing victim is one 9f their traits
The Great Euthanizers are already onto phases 2,3,4,5,6,...
There is a systematic worldwide initiative to censor misinformation and disinformation by imposing a life sentence based on the amorphous charge of engaging in a hate crime.
The US government just allocated $1 billion in its most recent budget for gain of function research on H5N1 and the manufacturing vaccines for it. The mortality rate of this "lower respiratory" illness is 15% vs 1-3% for the "upper respiratory" Covid illness.
The Great Euthanizers are a public-private partnership with $10 trillion at their disposal and hundreds of issue specific NGO's as tentacles to brainwash, sterilize, and euthanize us.
Like all battle fields the injuries, bodies, and lies are piling up but we must carry on the fight understanding every step of the way, " that without God I can't but without me He won't.
We always need to be encouraging each other with the Truth and Good solutions to the crises in queue and generated by The Great Euthanizers.
Along the line of vaccines, see neurological adverse events in children under age of 2 associated with vaccinations: https://accscience.com/journal/AN/articles/online_first/1288 - is it easier to discredit those who point out flaws than to test for possible manufacturing contaminates like endotoxins?
Doctor have known about deadly vaccine side effects since before I was born.
https://danielnagase.substack.com/p/history-babies-vaccines-and-sudden
I read the original post with distinct feelings of unease. All is now clear. Thank you so much for that deconstruction Dr Nagase.
Such a thoughtful & helpful piece -Causing me to use many
Facets of my reading, thinking & discernment capacities ! Loved it
I just think that our common senses are now in hyper drive to detect deepfake generated realty. Our senses are on high alert having observed the casualties of war and we know they are not finished. We cannot afford to let our guard down under any circumstances. Perception and response in defense is physical, mental and spiritual. Discernment increases based upon our common experiences to ascertain what is genuine or contrived. In the end; no deals.
Psalms 37:1-40 Amen
⚖⚓⌛