25 Comments

Thank you for fighting. Thank you for continuing the fight.

In times of war the law and the courts don't work as they should. And to be clear we are at war.

War is no longer troops shelling a town into submission or tanks driving down the boulevard of a conquered city it is the control of Words and Thoughts and Freedoms without a bullet being discharged. But there are casualties and deaths, just from a different weapon.

Expand full comment

Daniel, (with no disrespect to your salutation as a doctor) I half remember you talking with Christopher James whom operates a website known as "A Warrior Calls". Please correct me if I am wrong.

I believe you have finally reached the point of enlightenment where you have finally discovered that a great deal of what Christopher James has been active with is a realization that indeed, both the laws of Canada as well as our legal system do not work in the citizens favor, or are being manipulated against us. You, as well as many others have become victims of our own system. The system has been assembled/manipulated against us, and it does seem that the lawyers as Christopher James suggests are indeed liar's per se' and even John Carpay of the JCCF has had cases thrown out. And then, can we possibly mention corrupted judges within the system whom seem to be protecting the system?

At this juncture, what would be your best way to attack the system? Find a lawyer that is either retired or about to retire to represent you that has "no skin in the game" and understands what you are up against, this too may be a difficult task. Or, the other option is to fight the system yourself, which I assume is a daunting task? Not to mention what judge your case would come against.

I see Canadian lawyers fight cases (think Rocco Galati) based on our constitutional right get struck down.

Where to turn to? Have you even considered fighting this case yourself?

I have several other suggestions, however, this public forum may not be the place to suggest same. Should you reach out, a few alternative ideas could be tabled. Willing to comment on same.

Paul Draper

Expand full comment

Thank you Dr. Nagase for this deliberate explanation about Canada laws system based on your case and other’s cases happened around me which a lot of nurses and staffs fired by hospitals without comply the mandatory vaccine policy. All of the related unions lost functions to challenge the employers who break the agreements.

You are bold and strong and wisdoms, especially with God’s will and help on you and family.

He is the lasting energy and helps and purpose.

God Blessed

Expand full comment

Thank you, Dr. Nagase for your heroism. The situation is nothing short of nightmarish.

And thanks for validating my own take on the Charter of so-called Rights and Freedoms, ie, it's not worth the paper it's written on, with its continuous use of the weasel word "reasonable." All power is in the Judge's seat.

Expand full comment

Simply put.

This PURE COMMUNISM in our totally infiltrated country of CHINADA.

5 million people to the Parliament buildings to do Romania part two will stop this

IToo many SHEEPLE still don't get what is happening.

My family already ran from this 80 years ago.

Dad iand Mom still here at 90 and 91 watching and pissed off.

Expand full comment

Daniel, you are so onto the path regarding the sham of the 'legal' system. There is another Canadian, Cal Washington who has been someone who has been unearthing the basis for the disconnect we have in our understanding/believing that the 'legal' system is neutral entity that is there to represent people and their grievances with organizations/governmental overreach, etc. The commonwealth nations, and even the USA lawyers make their oath to the crown. The people of each country are not fully informed about their countries, provinces/states, counties, cities are all 'incorporated' and the people therein are not regarded as being due consideration outside of being owned entities who are only there for the benefit of the owners of the corporations, with the crown and those few behind or a part of the crown, known as the committee of 300, and other nefarious named groups.

This is a video that will help explain some of it... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7-p63o3zfQ

There is a growing number of people who are becoming aware of the situation we all face... Words to research - strawman, common law vs merchant law... It is a research journey I started on a couple of years ago with the onset of the covid-mania

Here's a couple of links to some free pdfs that can start providing information...

https://www.docdroid.net/X209yYu/meet-your-strawman-pdf#page=6

http://www.strawmanstory.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Strawman_Story_V1_Final_Free_Download_080617.pdf

My prayers are with you and all others who have been standing against the system of lies, death, and destruction. I also pray that the overstepping of those behind the veil will awaken people to their real views and the plans they purpose to subject mankind to.

Expand full comment

And in the U.S. there are many cities and districts - such as Washington D.C. that are set up as MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. As these entities are of a corporate nature, it changes the whole ball game as to who may be pursued in courts and under what laws and 'CORPORATE statutes'. That is why you almost never see politicians and criminals convicted in these jurisdictions.

Furthermore, most major politicians in D.C - even up to the Vice-President Kamala Harris herself - have no officially notatised oaths (which is required by law). See Todd Callendar's work on this and his writ to uncover the legal truths in this respect (check SGTReport on rumble for vids).

These are some of many legal shenanigans by which these parasitical thieves and charlatans get away with all their nefarious criminal offenses.

Dunno why now have James Brown's song "Living in America" in my head (you know, like in the Rocky movie).

Expand full comment

Here is another 'rabbit hole' to consider looking into here on substack,

https://substack.com/notes/post/p-127353998

Expand full comment

I can see why Quebec wanted to secede lo those years ago. My Dad was from Ft. Coulonge, so please know I am rooting for you from here in Oregon. On a lighter note, Charles doesn't look so healthy.

Expand full comment

That's a brighter note!

Expand full comment

True. However oddly enough he is genuinely, into plants and patron of a homeopathy group in the UK. He is also into crystals (rocks and minerals). That doesn't necessarily make him a good monarch tho.

Expand full comment

Why isn't the Jurcice Center in AB taking on your case? They are helping in quite a few difficult cases and rely completely on funding from small donations from average citizens.

Expand full comment

BTW, I sent the JCCF an email requesting the reason they are declining your case.

Dr Nagase,

Here in North Vancouver, I've been hearing increasing numbers of ambulance sirens daily. This started in late 2022 and continues to the present. I've lived in the same home since 1987 and have never heard so many sirens before in a daily basis. I can surmise that some are due to the state mandated injectables.

Expand full comment

Thank you

Expand full comment

Dr. Nagase, IMHO you would most probably represent yourself best as you KNOW A LOT! I wouldn't trust any such lawyer (BAR lawyer's especially). I have so much respect for you and have been following many of the cases against doctors in Canada. It is utterly disgusting what is happening, and it is my belief that all high ranking individuals at the various medical associations have been paid off, globally, as have academia, judiciary and medical journals. Watching what is happening in the US as well with Dr. Kory and Dr. Marik and they are now appealing the losses of their licenses. IT IS A MASSIVE conspiracy against anyone who thinks for themself and has any moral compass or ethics. Most lawyers only seem to be interested in winning cases and making money. I pray that you continue to be strong and steadfast. Many blessings being sent your way.

Expand full comment

Thank you.

Expand full comment

Hi Daniel, here are a few observations I have:

1) I am surprised that the JCCF has refused to help you. Did they give you a reason for not taking your case?

2) I didn't known about QC/KC lawyers, So, thanks for sharing this. As for who they are directly or indirectly subservient to is difficult to say. 2 points. I may be mistaken and am not a lawyer (so take this with a huge grain of salt) but I think that it depends on the province. I know that BC as a province is set up as a corporation (this is verifiable) and, as such, that the bar is compromised, i.e., the bar is not there to serve the public as per Common Law (as in tort cases for instance), but rather is directed under commercial or other law. Each province is different. In Quebec, we have civil law, so the bar is not compromised in this way (like in France), but might be corrupted in other ways.

3) On whether these QC/KC lawyers are subservient to the British Crown, well that wouldn't be too surprising (we've both made posts about Oaths in this respect). Just look at the words and actions of King Charles - particularly since his coronation. He is pro-WEF/UN 2030 agendas. That is blatantly obvious. As such, the Commonwealth governments (at various levels and ministries/departments) have indeed been on board with the C19 harsh measures and mandates, as per the WEF's Great Reset. In other words, they are subservient to these interests and unelected parasites rather than serving their citizens.

3) Canadians (and members of other Commonwealth countries) FORGET that Canada is legally bound by and signatory to: the United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner’s International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (see https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights) (adopted by a General Assembly resolution on December 16th, 1966) obligates member states (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Covenant_on_Civil_and_Political_Rights), through several treaties, to protect individuals and groups against human rights abuses and refrain from interfering with or curtailing the enjoyment of human rights. Canada has ratified the covenant and it came into force on 1976-08-19 (ref.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Covenant_on_Civil_and_Political_Rights)

Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights clearly states the following:

“Article 7

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.”

See also articles: 4, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25,

Why is NOBODY talking about this? The Nuremberg code, while good, is not legally binding on countries. But the one above IS.

These are LEGAL agreements that ought to be respected but don't seem to be. Lawyers should be citing this for legal cases about C19. Why aren't they?

Canada has not respected this at all. Why? And can they (or the Crown) be prosecuted for the breaches? If so, under international law or others?

I will be reading your other 2 parts soon (and likely commenting on them).

Thanks for posting this!

Expand full comment

The JCCF gave no reason. They they didn't respond to my email in Dec 2021. As an outsider to the JCCF law organization, it looks like they are only fighting for small wins. They're not using any meaningful arguments with existing laws such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. This is after almost 3 years! When a group of intelligent lawyers raise money but appear to ignoring obvious wins, the question to ask is why?

Expand full comment

Unlike the work I am doing for free, I only know of 1 lawyer from quebec who fought the mandates pro bono. Any lawyer who wins this would be winning the biggest settlement in history. So the fact that they are all asking for our money to fight is a very big discrepancy. https://danielnagase.substack.com/p/discrepancy-analysis

Expand full comment

Thank you Daniel. I will have a look.

Expand full comment

"If viewed in the context that all lawyers have an oath to the Crown, and the likelihood the Crown is the source of all the crimes against humanity that occurred in Commonwealth countries like Canada, then Canadian lawyers “fundraising” off the volunteers and supporters in the freedom movement can only have 1 purpose.

To remove as much money and resource as possible from people fighting for truth and human rights in Canada."

I could pile on but will cut to chase. When facing an adversary it is good to have a realistic vision of what you are up against. You are surely on to it. I would ask sincerely is there any institution that has not been corrupted? Can one be formed?

So much injustice, layer on layer. That such dangerous things have gone on unfettered or even acknowledged is a sign we are on virgin territory. Our lives our at risk from the vey institutions tasked with and reimbursed for protecting those lives.

We look at the crimes that our system typically punishes and the nature of the punishment. You have virtually been condemned to a life sentence, without a jury of your peers, for an act that can simply be interpreted as following your professional code of ethics, perfectly.

While I can sympathize, am left wanting as to how to help find justice in this Fascist State. The only way to access "justice" in this Crown system is to purchase and the price is beyond regular and even relatively wealthy. If the King says off with your head, so be it!

Expand full comment

Will Danielle Smith's win in Alberta assist in reversing any of these egregious moves against you Dr. Nagase?

Or is the Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons an All Powerful entity?

Expand full comment

Let's hope with Premier Smith. Last year when her office was requesting doctors accounts of what Alberta Health Services and the Colleges did to them, I sent in a detailed account of everything that happened to me in Rimbey hospital by email and directly through a contact on the Board of Governors of the United Conservative Party. I have not yet received a reply.

Expand full comment

Try again.

Explain "No response to date, my email must have been misplaced..."

Request a formal response.

Send this via registered mail: Signature Required.

Expand full comment