18 Comments
User's avatar
Luvvvy's avatar

Good post Daniel. I see this as an AI Machine taking over everything, and dominating humanity without any resistance from humanity itself. You can call out this artificial shit show and people don’t react, where is the push back. Seems people don’t feel an even a little protective of our special gifts that area being artificially reproduced. This alarms the heck out of me. Time to realize we will become obsolete and subservient to something or someone other than the Creator.

And This is all happening NOW.. not in the future. We have human-run governments that are promoting a sub-human life for fellow humans via AI. They are all pushing all towards 2-Dimensional non-human services.

My friends in Northern Ontario are currently being conditioned to not have an in-person doctor or nurse practitioner, as they are all being “retired” and not replaced. The citizens are all dependent on many Rx’s and have been told that the Pharmacist will renew for only 3 months. After that … 🤷‍♀️. I am certain that they would/will, all obediently sign up for AI Medical care, just as they passively rolled up the sleeves for their shots. I mean, it’s inhuman … what human does not want human contact, and concern, especially unwell humans?!

‼️ No comprendo, Are we being led into a battle, or a test to see where our consciousness belongs, in terms of dimensions.?? Why are we being tempted and seduced to embrace 2-D - living through a screen, which will cause us to devolve, from our 3++ dimensional living. So provocative, In a time when we have an opportunity for ascension, and progress to higher dimensions.

I don’t agree with allowing non-human, heartless and soullless Artifical machines to rule over me. I choose onward and upward.

Expand full comment
Guido's avatar

The problems of medicine are much older than just a few years. They were created in 3 ways:

1) licensing: the primary outcomes of a licensed profession are scarcity and control

2) high salary: attract a higher percentage of people who are only driven by money rather than patient care and medicine

3) partnership between industry and education: Pharma sponsors universities and the medical literature -> control the narrative

It's been a long and slow process to get the Canadian medical system to be the train wreck we see

today but I don't really see that AI is going to make it so much worse. If it does then it might

finally break it and that is the first step to fixing it. If it works to some degree then it

could also be a new layer of competition and there could be benefits to that too.

McGill University gave Fauci in 2021 an honorary doctorate around the same time as Rand Paul suggested that he was a criminal. The corruption is there in plain sight and they have no shame to publicly announce it. They feel so secure that they don't bother to hide. It means probably that the height of the corruption has been reached and change is around the corner. In this case something new does not mean worse.

Expand full comment
Brandon Pringle's avatar

This is an article of immense importance.

Thank you, Dr Nagase, for writing such an important article.

The Hippocratic Oath: First Do No Harm, is a specifically Biblical principle.

The God-hating Nazi doctors did the most despicable evil pursuing their god - satan.

To the degree that doctors have adopted Bible principles, is to the degree they will be good.

To the degree that doctors reject Bible principles, is to the degree they will be evil.

This applies to all of humanity.

A report written for the 70th anniversary of Nuremburg showed that more doctors joined the NAZI party than any other profession in Germany, and they became more thoroughly Nazified than their counterparts.

When I first was told by a young person about how "amazing" AI and CHATGPT are, I asked him if it contains any Bible. He responded that no, "because they didn't want it to be biased."

QUESTION: Shouldn't we all be strongly biased to good, and strongly biased against evil?

This is impossible without the Bible.

If covid taught us anything, it taught us that humanity is by its own nature full of unimaginable evil.

We have had more training on kindness to our fellow man than any time in history, yet humanity has drifted farther away from its claims of goodness. The more humanity claims to be striving for utopia, without God, we find humanity descending into the most satanic evil. 27 million people imprisoned in sex trafficking and slavery.

A doctor has a conversation with a demon: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/yQe6pq_ATv4

After my conversation with this young person, I immediately went home and - as I suspected - within a few minutes was watching a video on YouTube talking about how AI would control or destroy humanity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvdwpbaopRk

When AI was asked what its favorite book was, it responded with Richard Dawkins. Richard Dawkins is a God-hating atheist. Atheism is responsible for the genocides of Stalin, Lenin, and Mao that murdered 250 million people. Atheism is responsible for the slaughter of 10 million by Hitler. Atheism is responsible for the murderous regimes of fascism and communism. Do we need any more proof that CHATGPT is insanely dangerous? By filling CHATGPT with HUMAN reasoning, it is guaranteed to be corrupt in its very nature.

The Bible says about humans: "Professing themselves to be wise, they became utter fools." Romans 1:22

The Bible goes on: "Only fools say in their hearts, "there is no God". Psalms 14:1

All the freedoms of good, such as freedom of speech, human rights and freedom of conscience all are exclusively rooted in Western Civilization, the foundation of which is from the Bible.

As a studied Pastor, I maintain that a smart atheist finds a pastor as his best friend. The freedom of speech Christians sought when they fled to America to escape religious persecution, became the greatest freedom for atheists also. There are 150 countries in the world you can get your head cut off for publicly saying there is no God.

America is the safest place in the world for an atheist to live.

If I could be good without God - I wouldn't need Jesus.

But humanity can't be good without God - that is precisely why we need Jesus.

When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything.”

― G.K. Chesterton

Expand full comment
Anna Kindy's avatar

Great post Daniel

Imagine AI in all aspects of our lives. It will be present in the courtrooms, hospitals and clinics, banks, grocery stores, our homes including our appliances, thermostats ect, our "gadgets" ie phones, computers, cars. The list goes on. AI "trained" to recognise noncompliance and nudging you toward's the "right behavior".

So how do you go against what seems inevitable?

Become self sufficient in every aspect ie live off grid haha. So the choice will be enslavement and "comfort" or living like our ancestors and be "free".

Expand full comment
Daniel Nagase MD's avatar

the answers to the future lie in the past.

Expand full comment
Su Chin's avatar

Small topic but Big Deal.

Expand full comment
Paul Koop's avatar

I appreciate your intelligence and allowing your creativity in thought to express at this level.

Just keep in mind that so many decisions on how and where to appropriate taxpayer funds has been directed by computer AI for close to 30 years in terms of investment return and insurance costs and so the funding data closes in on the convergence when all future decisions are based on what we have allowed AI to select in the past

Primarily the nonsense we experienced through Covid-19 was the result of learned training applied to AI and should be understood in each aspect of society from media to medicine based on risk assessment algorithms

Expand full comment
Daniel Nagase MD's avatar

Yes it was about 20 years ago that I first heard about the competition between high frequency trading algorithms needing construction of new microwave communication towers between Chicago and New York. Different trading pools would invest millions to have a communication channel just a millisecond or two faster to give their "Algo" an advantage buying and selling. The profits from buying and selling just a millisecond faster between the Chicago and New York exchange would yield returns far in excess of the cost spent on towers. (At least until the competition built a better tower) So if the AI's of the 2000's were already battling in milliseconds on stock exchanges, they already had human traders beat at least a decade prior in the 90's.

Expand full comment
Helen Scott's avatar

Amazing Insight from a Human perspective Daniel.

Who controls the world!? (Is this a statement or a question?!)

Why have we let this happen?

Where do we go from here?

What has humanity gained or learned?

How do we unite and correct the wrong-doings for humanities sake for 'all children'?

Expand full comment
Daniel Nagase MD's avatar

These are all things we must think about and answer. If not, some politician using chat gpt will answer it for us pretending he came up with it himself all the while being just a mouthpiece for an ai controlled world.

Expand full comment
Former UK resident's avatar

Could you please call it Mondrian-ish. These shorts look hideous and don't even seem to contain the Golden Ratio.

I suppose it's down to the AI creator's level of consciousness, no? That will be reflected on the outcome.

At the mo, AI doesn't have any sense of responsibility and conscience.

AI as a diagnostic tool can be useful as a gate keeper when someone calls an ambulance bc the person was scratched (mildly) by a pet cat (a real case here!). But again, at the same time, it can cause dependency on the technology. Can be easily manipulated unless we are conscious.

Besides, legal framework is not fully established. In Japan recently they used AI to write scripts to revive a very popular old manga / animé of a super talented surgeon (probably you're familiar? It's Black Jack). They picked AI generated 'acceptable' storylines and refined them and also did draw the actual animé figures by human hand They refrained from letting the AI do that on the ethical and legal ground at this point in time. I really think humans should always have a final say and control.

Expand full comment
Daniel Nagase MD's avatar

i watched the Japanese neurosurgeon anime Monster, and it made me consider how good are people anyway? The historical fiction based on true child experimentation by east German stasi, doctors and government was horrific. But the subtext of the series was that everyone who supported the government by keeping that society running was also guilty even for small sins such as "turning a blind eye" really

expanded my perspective.

Expand full comment
Former UK resident's avatar

Sadly still happening...

Moral and ethical issues are one thing. It seems like there is always a group of people who don't operate on principles. Primarily they operate on their benefit (whatever that is) in their game of chess.

Expand full comment
Stephen Malthouse's avatar

Thanks. Thought-provoking, but stuck on a premise of "mind". AI will certainly have a better brain than humans, but we still don't know where thought comes from. Track that down and AI will not be a threat to you. Algorithmic doctors will be replaced, sure, but the genuine "human" feeling that patients experience, often subconsciously, will become even more valuable in physicians that harbor and develop it. Medicine is changing and, just as energy therapeutics are rising, so this authentic human-human relationship will become more integral to healing.

Perhaps we should stop calling brain function "mind" and take a page from the Buddhists. AI and the recklessness of "I am doing it because I can" are pushing us to delve deeper into our true nature. It is just telling us to move on. Forcing us to move on.

What chicanery the governments and institutions will pull is predictable if we do not stop their current attack on humanity. Using a "smarter Judge", the self-selected elite will try to control people's lives by applying convenient AI measurements of value to society and permit freedoms, even life, on that basis.

The bottom line is that 0 or 1 will always be 0 or 1, not matter how many of them you have or how fast they can be computed. It is possible that humans are 0 or 1, both 0 and 1 and neither 0 or 1 simultaneously.

Expand full comment
Reg's avatar

My current mindset is that I'd prefer an AI Dr. over a human Dr. Seems that the A.I. Dr. would be less influenced by politics, personal prejudices, and personal assumptions. The A.I. would simply give us the facts. All the facts.

Expand full comment
Daniel Nagase MD's avatar

unless the AI learns, prejudice and deception, just like LAMDA did.

Expand full comment
We The People's avatar

Garbage in, garbage out. The training received makes AI stupider and stupider by the day. Similar to the University brainwashing of Doctors to obey the holy "guidelines" so it's Sophie's choice.

Expand full comment
SoCalGal's avatar

Unappealing weird

Expand full comment