Applied Psychology Part 1

What Psychologists sometimes do, without telling you...

Without reading the comments or watching the beginning of the video, I would like the reader to start watching at 7 minutes and 20 seconds and stop at 7 minutes 43 seconds. For less than 30 seconds I’d like the viewer to watch with critical vigilance while keeping an open mind without prejudice. After no more than 30 seconds go on to read my thoughts about what you just witnessed.

https://rumble.com/v2bceui-amazing-polly-on-jordan-peterson.html

(And then reanalyze everything you’ve seen and make your own conclusions. Please share your ideas in the comments. The only thing more important to me than my thoughts are yours.)

---

My background in psychology is a bit different from pop psychology in magazines like Psychology Today, or internet self help pages. It is also very far removed from Academic psychology as my line of work makes me only interested in what I can apply daily to real life encounters in the Emergency Department.

Decades ago, an FBI¹ training manual on how to spot a lie was my introduction to psychology. Aside from the obvious signs of nervous behavior, it went into “experienced” liars and more subtle signs such as specific directions of eye movement, hand motions such as covering the mouth and blinking too often. They didn’t go very deeply into the theory of why these are signs of deception, but I did grasp the concept that the telltale signs are usually related to avoidant behaviors that are seen in all mammals. The sub-cortical reflexes are basically the subconscious acting in response to discrepancies.

---

(Trigger warning)

Here’s my analysis of the most important 24 seconds of the video above.

• 7:20 seconds. "I got the vaccine so that's a partial answer on my part ... but I understand the position of those who don't want to take it, but I would be unwilling to compel them by force because that's for sure that's not the right approach"

If you look carefully at the video when Jordan Peterson says this, he blinks several times noticeably, and during the section where he says he would be “unwilling to compel them by force” he looks up and to his right. Looking up and to the right in someone with standard left brain memory and right brain creativity, is sometimes but not always the sign of a lie. It can merely be a sign of fabrication or creativity.

To figure out if Peterson’s mea culpa of not “forcing” people to take the vaccine is actually a lie, one has to look carefully at what he says next.

(Frequent blinking can also be a sign of a lie, especially ones that create a discrepancy between the subconscious and the conscious. When a part of the mind knows the person is lying or trying to manipulate by putting on an "Act", the fear of others discovering that lie leads to avoidant behavior e.g. blinking to protect the eyes from projectiles.)

• Next Jordan Peterson says: "Although I would encourage people to get the damned vaccine and lets get the hell over this… but I did that I put My Body on the line to do that....”

  • “Damned vaccine” indicates Dr. Jordan Peterson is aware that the mRNA injection is bad.

  • “I put my body on the line to do that..”

    • Is Peterson trying to say I suffered serious harm or risk of serious harm to MY BODY… and therefore so should YOU?

---

I don't know what kind of psychology Jordan teaches, but amongst my friends this is called a "Guilt Trip". Manipulating others using the emotion of guilt.

---

• Jordan Peterson then goes on to say: “It's my decision (to take the vaccine), I'm NOT saying it's right, it’s what I decided to do."

In real world psychology, making statements with a negative like "I'm NOT saying it's right." Actually means the opposite as if the word “Not” didn’t exist.

e.g. "I'm NOT saying it's right." = "I'm saying I'M RIGHT"

^The the subconscious according to mainstream psychologic theory cannot process negatives. Therefore putting a negative into a sentence is a way to fool the conscious listener with one message while saying the exact opposite to the subconscious. (Does a tenured psychology professor know about this?)

---

What does this all mean?

Remember Jordan Peterson looking up and to the right when he was saying he wouldn’t “force” people to take the vaccine?

• “ I would encourage people to get the damned vaccine and lets get the hell over this.”

• “I put My Body on the line to do that....”

• “It's my decision (to take the vaccine), I'm NOT saying it's right, it’s what I decided to do.”

  • Who is “I”? A professor of psychology? Isn’t the speaker implicitly using his status as Dr. Peterson to claim he is right?

    • He’s so righteous that he sacrificed his body to “save” society so we can all get the “HELL over this”? … (and so should you?)

• When Dr. Jordan Peterson emphatically repeats his claim that it was his decision, it makes me really wonder if it really was Dr. Jordan Peterson’s decision, or did someone coerce him into taking it.

---

What does it all add up to?

Does:

Guilt trip + I’m right + I’m Dr. Jordan Peterson

=

Coercing others using authority to take the vaccine?

(Remember what Dr. Jordan Peterson said about NOT forcing others to take the medical experiment while looking up and to the Right?)

Was this earlier statement a lie or not? you be the judge.

---

Perhaps “Coerce” isn’t quite accurate. Accurate would be “I’m using my authority as Doctor Jordan Peterson, better educated than 99% of you all, to ENCOURAGE you to take a vaccine that I know is so terrible that I call it DAMMNED, with an extra emphasis of guilt upon YOU because I put MY BODY at risk for all of you by DOING MY PART.”

Maybe Dr. Jordan Peterson didn’t want to Force anyone to take the vaccine, he just wanted to strongly manipulate people into taking it?

---

Dr. Peterson’s failure to stand up to the forced experimental medical injections raised numerous red flags.

Since then, Dr. Peterson has been working the sympathy narrative as to why he caved into pressure to take the medical experiment and encourage others to do the same.

Should we be sympathetic?

To claim INNOCENCE, he would have to not know he was doing wrong.

Did he know it was wrong?

• the mRNA injections were always advertised as a medical experiment. For a psychology professor to not see through all the euphemisms for “Experiment” e.g. “emergency use authorization” would be unusual.

• The “vaccine” in Dr. Peterson’s own knowledge was so bad he called it “Dammned”.

• He stated he put his body “on the line”.

  • Does this mean that Jordan Peterson KNOWS it is dangerous?

  • (when people are doing something good for their body do they make a drama out of it? I put my body “on the line” eating an orange!!! Emphasizing danger is something people only do with things that they KNOW are dangerous.)

  • In this case Dr. Peterson knew the “vaccine” was dangerous.

But he pushed it ANYWAY.

Is it reasonable to claim innocence???

---

But he was suffering from family tragedies and his own substance problems.

Was he really suffering so much that he had a moment of weakness?

People who took something they know is bad, because they had a moment of weakness, from tragedy, substance abuse and / or dependence, generally don’t ENCOURAGE others to take the same harmful treatment that they succumbed to.

In fact caring people do the OPPOSITE.

I know this to be a fact because a dear doctor friend in Northern Alberta told me she took the mRNA injection and she felt like she was going to die. She hasn’t been able to work more than 1/2 time ever since because of side effects. Knowing how it harmed her, she didn’t recommend or push the medical experiment on others.

So why did Dr. Jordan Peterson not do the same? Why didn’t he warn people how bad it was? He clearly knew it was awful.

Does a guilt trip, emotional manipulation, and coercion look like “weakness”?

---

Worst case scenario

The reason I always gravitate to the worst case scenario is likely because I am an emergency doctor. The worst case scenario is the one that usually results in the most death. The most important part of my day to day job while I was working was to prevent the worst case scenario from ever happening.

Here’s the WCS:

• If you have an individual encouraging others to take something harmful, something that might cause them suffering and death, without any gain, that is worse than a sociopath. That is a psychopath.

(If true, this means a large part of the freedom and truth movement has been captured and is following a psycho(logist))

---

But Daniel. You must be wrong. The Peterson’s have suffered so much!!! Have some sympathy! I feel so sorry for them!!!

Maybe.

If Jordan Peterson had come out with all his knowledge of Western European History, Philosophy and Politics, and along with his Mea Culpa for having mislead his following:

• stated emphatically that coercion for mutilation and medical experimentation is a war crime according to the 1998 Rome Statute

• or stated that coercion to medical experimentation violates the Universal Declaration of Human Rights from 1948.

I’d accept his sympathy narrative. A true Mea Culpa deserves true forgiveness.

Unfortunately, my experience with Emergency Room work in Canada has left me with knowledge that addicts are often the best at creating sympathy narratives. The more experienced and intelligent the addict, the better their “story” and their skill at tugging at people’s heartstrings. Sadly, it seems to me much of the freedom movement has been captured by cults of personality, some of whom were born out of the university of substance abuse.

---

I refuse to believe you that Dr. Jordan Peterson is a Psychopath!!!

I didn’t say that. I said that a psychopath is the worst case scenario when someone is encouraging others to do something harmful or deadly to themselves without personal gain. If they did it for money, power or status, that’s a sociopath.

The other, perhaps more likely, possibilities are:

1. Dr. Peterson was abused and bullied as a child and / or as an adolescent.

   1. I remember from watching some of Dr. Peterson’s early videos, he described growing up in a very violent and crude small town called Fairview Alberta, where he described being bullied and the hard life growing up.

   2. I can verify that decades later in the mid 2010’s Fairview Alberta was still a very rough town. I worked a number of locums there, and in addition to the hospital related murder scandal, I myself had a close call with extreme violence from a Fairview RCMP officer. (Canadian equivalent of the Feds)

      1. Here’s what happened: I was driving to the hospital after an emergency call for a deteriorating pneumonia patient. Getting into town, I slowed down to 10km (6 mph) above the speed limit.

         1. An oncoming SUV suddenly did a U turn behind me and flashed police lights.

         2. I slowed down, leaned out the window showing my hospital scrubs and yelled I was heading to the hospital.

         3. When I resumed driving at exactly the speed limit, this SUV with police lights still flashing tried to ram me from behind. My guess is that the only reason the police officer slammed the brakes before making contact was because I was in an old 2006 1 tonne pickup, that still being mostly steel in the 2000’s would have wrecked his 2016 era mostly plastic GMC suburban.

         4. In an attempt to de-escalate, I came to a complete stop at the intersection, leaned head, shoulders and torso out the window and yelled I was going to see an emergency patient.

         5. The officer demanded over the police speaker to know the patient’s name.

         6. I got back in my truck and continued driving to the hospital at 30 km/hr with the Officer running his siren and honking his horns the entire way.

         7. When I got to the ER doors, I had to wait for the nurse to buzz me in, and while I waited the officer screamed at me that I had to tell HIM the name of my patient.

         8. The officer screamed 3 times, “You have to tell me the name of the patient, DO YOU UNDERSTAND!!!” The last time he spat in my face making a physical threat approaching within inches of my face while standing over me.

         9. The ER nurse buzzed me in, and I went to the trauma room to see my patient. Out of the corner of my eye, I saw the officer questioning the patient’s husband.

         10. I shut the trauma room doors behind me without saying a word to the Fairview RCMP officer.

         11. Hours later after I had stabilized the patient and put her on life support, I went to sleep in the patient room next door.

         12. When I woke up I realized how close I had come to being assaulted and knocked out of commission by the police officer. This would have resulted in my patient dying and the police officer let off without a charge of manslaughter.

      2. Here’s what I realized:

         1. Each time the RCMP officer screamed “DO YOU UNDERSTAND!!!” he wasn’t asking if I comprehended, he was asking if I STOOD UNDER his demand which became a LAW that he make up on the spot. His new “law” was that I had to tell him the name of my patient.

            1. There is no law requiring a patient with pneumonia to give their name to the police. But under the Canadian Legal system, Officers can fabricate laws on the spot, that if someone agrees to STAND UNDER it, (Under Stand) they can be assaulted and arrested if they refuse for the crime of “Disobeying an Officer”.

   3. From a number of work assignments in Fairview, I experienced just a taste of the violence and injustice² that can happen in a small Alberta town. But I had the strength to handle the situation as a fully grown adult. I can’t imagine what it must have been like as a child growing up there. I have understanding and great sympathy for anyone who suffers a childhood in such an environment.

   4. However, I also know that sometimes it is the abused who turn into abusers later on in adulthood. Sometimes the presentation in the Emergency Room is self abuse with prescription drugs. Sometimes it is abuse of others.

   5. Recommending others take something harmful, while possessing enough knowledge of history, psychology and society to know that forced medical experimentation is wrong is not something a rough childhood or adulthood can excuse.

---

Another Possibility

While most of us are familiar with the hero narrative of the bad guy turned good, we should keep in mind that the opposite can also be true. A good guy can be turned bad. Money, envy, jealousy or any of the seven deadly sins and more can turn someone good, who has done nothing but good for decades, to do wrong.

Is this the case with Jordan Peterson?

I don’t know. But thinking about how ruthless the powers that be have been to orchestrate COVID, I suspect coercion, bribery and manipulation are tools they use daily. In fact, from their perspective, taking down someone who has previously been good is probably a very high priority, because by corrupting a leader, they not only take out a leader, they also demoralize the followers.

If we take things one layer of ruthlessness deeper, keeping a “good” leader on payrole as a sleeper agent who plays the role of the good leader can be even more damaging if he only misleads his following at the point of maximum damage. (I suspect this is one of the roles that they had planned out for Dr. Robert Malone, until his cover was blown.)

---

Speaking of Ruthless, How cheap is it to Buy the World?

Lets do the math:

G20 countries = 20 most important countries in the world.

(No one really cares about what the social, political or economic trends are in the 21st country)

To control both sides of the political spectrum, both the governing “Party” and the “Opposition Party” involves roughly 100 people.

• 50 people in the “Governing” side, cabinet and executive,

• and 50 leaders and critics of the “opposition”

20 countries x 100 politicians per country = 2000 people.

• That’s right. About 2000 people control the world.

---

How much would it take to “control” 2000 politicians?

• How about $1 million US dollars each?

2000 politicians x 1 million dollars per politician = $2 billion dollars.

• Bill Gates net worth is 131.3 Billion dollars.

• 2 billion = 1.5% of his net worth.

Basically for Bill Gates, controlling the G20 is a 1.5% business expense. (And he’s just one of the billionaires we know about)

If you think we live in democracies, my mathematical “model” of the real world says different.

---

Back to Dr. Jordan Peterson, supposing that powers like that got to someone who grew up bullied in a rough town like Fairview Alberta, I am understanding and sympathetic to how in the face of such forces, most people will fail.

However, give me a failure, and my tendency is to search for a source in order to find a solution. My thought so far is this. If a thought system is based on heirarchies of power, of which money is one proxy, whenever faced with any greater power, such belief systems will cause their leaders to crumble. Consequently, when leaders fail, so do their followers.

---

What’s the solution?

The solution actually is not about the leader, it is getting rid of followers. If people think reasonably and rationally, cooperate within reason, use leaders only for specific purposes for short term tasks, then the fallibility of human vices can be minimized or removed. Subservience to power only works for a mind programmed to worship power (or money). A mind operating on a thought system based on justice, not power, doesn’t sway based on strength, it is only swayed by reason and that which is right.

Operating systems, (otherwise known as belief or thought systems) that can replace leader / follower modus operandi with individual initiative and rational cooperation, will hopefully be a post in the near future. But preferably, I won’t ever have to write it because you the reader will write something better than I ever could.

1. or CIA training manual. It’s been so long I can’t remember which.

2. Injustice seems to be a recurring problem in Fairview Alberta. Alberta Health Services stole an endoscope (A life saving device needed to stop bleeding from the stomach or intestines) from Fairview hospital. This was a medical device that the town had raised money and paid for, yet the RCMP (Canadian Federal Police) did nothing to recover the endoscope belonging to the townspeople. One of the alleged reasons for this theft was that Alberta Health Services wanted to centralize all endoscopy procedures (and the billings) to its central hospital in Grande Prairie. They couldn’t do this if Fairview hospital was independently saving lives with their own town endoscope.