34 Comments

You didn't fail. We are up against Goliath. Anyone who stands pokes the eye of Goliath. Everyone that stands in his or her own ways is a winner in my eyes and eventually will help encourage others to stand. We all may not stand the same way, and at the same time. Doesn't matter. As long as the 8 billion people continue to stand here and there, then everywhere. Be like whack a mole game. That is why the censorship is so strong. They can't even have just one person standing. Now when you stand you will take the heat. Bullets will be thrown at you. Not everyone can take the bullets, but they should expect it. They stand for how long they can stand and hopefully someone else takes the baton and runs with it.

This has been planned by the very wealthy controlling people for quite sometime and not just one person can take Goliath down. It has to be a community gathering together to do it.

I hope you continue to fight for your right to practice in what way suits you. I hope you win. Stay strong. This isn't easy.

About the girl. You didn't know. Under the circumstances you know in your heart you did nothing wrong. If you knew you would have offered that girl food. At the time in your eyes you weren't denying a hungry child food.

Expand full comment

This is Transcriber B on substack. Others are standing. I remember many more people standing than just this list too. Please click on the link to see you are not alone.

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/273.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment

Dr. Nagasse, censored Doctors & citizens have been holding twitter Xspaces by acct. @Wogpogreal every Monday & Thursday, We had Kevin McKernan & Jessica Rose in last past week. We are all fighting every way we can to ban covid shots. Would ike to know if available, schedule permitting next week May 20th or 23rd to be a speaker? I look forward to your response.

Expand full comment

Kevin McKernan the human genome eugenicist and Jessica Rose the Epigirl in event 201

Expand full comment

Thanks Dr. for your unique insights. They are very sobering, but make perfect sense. Katherine Watt says that judges in the US never address constitutional issues in these cases; if they rule in favor of health freedom it is on procedural grounds. One example is the ruling that said that OSHA overstepped its authority by forcing companies with 100+ employees to get the vax or pay a $70,000 fine per employee. Nonetheless this was a great ruling, without it I think it likely we would at some point faced gun-toting door to door vax enforcement.

Ms. Watt said she is virtually certain that judges have been threatened with physical harm to keep them corralled.

It is heartbreaking to realize what is happening to us at the hands of psychopaths, but it is an undeniable reality. They have been able to influence or remove almost all effective resistance.

On the subject of Jordan Peterson, Amazing Polly has done some good videos about what he has been up to. I can’t see into his or anyone else’s heart, however.

Expand full comment

I agree, no one can "see" into the heart or mind of another. The best we can do is make educated analyses of what people say and do. People who are "out of their minds" will often make accusations accompanied by a claim to know the motive. But without actually being witness to a motive, claiming to know what can only be in someone else's mind is automatically a falsehood, unless there was a confession. That is why the criminal justice system is so focused on witnesses and confessions. Without a confession, any attribution of motive for an act is speculation, and potentially false.

Expand full comment

Dr. Nagase: Thank you for another profound and thoughtful article. Western society - due to the rise of tyrants, bullies, and mediocrity - no longer values courage, moral courage, integrity, and critical thinking skills. God bless you always 🙏🏼🕊️💟✝️

Expand full comment

Very insightful and eye opening, Thank you!

Expand full comment

So here is why I like this post. It’s philosophical. Why it is best to be philosophical and why is this categorized as a philosophical essay?

1) talking only about people and events is uselessly impermanent if you stop at that. Never, ever does that change anything. Only philosophy creates change that’s permanent. If you’re not practicing philosophy you’re just wasting time. We must talk about ideas. Problem is, we have the question but if the answer is not easily reached, we stop thinking about it. No! Ask the question then keep it going.

2) he talks about people (Jordan Peterson) and events (rally) but unlike 99% who stop there, he continues on to ask ‘what’s going on behind these people and the events’. In other words, what is the true root cause? Solutions only emerge built from root causes. For a doctor that truth should be profoundly obvious. Well…only for some doctors it seems.

3) he doesn’t give the answer. That’s fine! If he had the answer on tap and wrapped up then this would not need the philosophical discipline! This is how solutions start though. Clearly define the problem, then afterwards get to work on identifying the root causes. He says, “I don’t know what the answer is,” but only the bravest ever even dare ask these questions and it’s incredibly important to continue, but properly, using philosophical discipline.

So to kick the can down the road and keep momentum going, I have these questions to help us all zero in on the critically valuable perspective which matches the real world. Participate if you only have another question. Don’t rush to some firm position/answer at this stage unless you’re willing to vigorously defend it, because that’ll take place.

- are the bulk people of people really that hopeless at their core? Amazonian tribes grate a poisonous root into the water so as to stun the fish and so they become easy to harvest. What if that’s what’s being done to us? If so, the root cause is not humanity itself but those who are purposefully stunning us. That totally changes the strategy and our morale, if this is true.

- your Manila experience is an example that describes exactly the poor outcomes emerging from an incorrect perspective which only was oriented correctly after the fact. This is what we are all experiencing (those who aren’t completely self delusional) Would we ever dare to openly ask ourselves (or another) to question profoundly the validity of our perspectives? That is where true power lies. So the question - is a despondent view of humanity really accurate?

- If I were tasked to show an Inuit person an orange for their first time and I took them to an orchard, would I show him a heap of rotten squashed rancid tree-fall and say, “yes, that’s an orange.” Those aren’t really oranges and the person would have an incorrect view of what an orange is. He may be turned off oranges but my p-oint is that those aren’t real oranges anymore. A real orange is bright, ripe and smells nice. What if with humans we are blending the two and calling them the same thing? That would be an incorrect perspective and give us poor results.

That’s just dipping the toe in the water for now but this is what we do with what he’s started. If it’s a philosophical essay then let’s do philosophy.

Expand full comment

Thank you Daniel for a great read which I reflected on why we make decisions.

I reflect:

1 Brain - I have conscious problem solving and decision making. I use critical thinking with facts.

2 Heart - I use love energy and compassion for others in my decision making.

3 Gut - I sometimes override my brain and heart because I have a strong inner sense my gut tells me to take another action.

I am suggesting that as sovereign beings we use a combination of these 3 decision making tools.

A good friend of mine “Borje” once told me the opposite of love is fear, and I thought at the time it didn’t seem correct.

I was wrong though because over time I discovered with respect to love and compassion that fears are often the ONLY thoughts that get in the way of my heart ❤️.

I now encourage myself to act spontaneously when I feel love and compassion 😁

Our 🇨🇦psychological war “government” uses fear as an effective tool for obedience and compliance.

You are a courageous leader who puts fear aside for the sake of others.

We can only be patient as the other Doctors build up enough courage to follow your path of love and compassion.

Thank you Daniel!

Expand full comment

It really makes one wonder where sayings like "Cross your heart" originated, and how the spelling of english words seem to send contradictory messages to the subconscious. For example, has anyone actually felt good in their heart about a con tract? What about a con sent form? If you look at english from the perspective of french or latin, the true meanings of words come to light.

Expand full comment

As I pictured your trip episode and the perfectly imperfect world playing itself out.. I had to laugh .. ER Dr. Daniel is always on call 😊

I see you as embodying ‘God’s Repairman’ fixing the Emergency Traumas that present physically, from the depths of our collective psyche, and that you treat the conditions with heart and honor. However in these other broken world departments, they don’t seem to share your dedication to best practices for humanity..

what to do? Just continue to be you, and keep working your path as you’ve helped save many lives.. Be the Good Medicine, be the intention to heal and mend, inside and out — and be as the prayer says, granted the serenity to accept the things you cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom that knows the difference…”

Expand full comment

Hi Daniel - I wish you and Dr Makis could get together - He's also in Alberta - have you seen this video https://action4canada.com/empower-hour-dr-william-makis-exposing-healthcare-leaders-april-3-2024/

Expand full comment

I can't be in canada right now. https://danielnagase.substack.com/p/my-substack-will-be-censored-in-5 An unwarranted court order can be used for all manner of skullduggery as we saw with Julian Assange, and Reiner Fulmich.

Expand full comment

ah. I didn't realize that - he might not be in Canada either. I guess I just thuoght that both of you might get further together fighting the Alberta Health authorities.

Expand full comment

Makis has been fighting AHS far longer than I have, unfortunately to no avail within the Alberta supreme court system. The latest i heard when we last met was that the courts handed a $40,000 judgment against him for vexatious litigation because he fought back after being fired by AHS (After setting up a successful provincial Cancer center.)

Expand full comment

I see. Yeah I heard him say recently he was going to ask Elon Musk to help him too as Musk is financially helping another doctor - Canadian doctor I beleive. I'm glad and of course - you are following his story. Its a terrible situation for both of you. And then there's that weird enterprise called the Wellness Company which he did belong to for a little while and then bowed out of. I suppose you are informed about that as well...but I can include the video link for Amazing Polly who did a deep dive into the ownership of that company - which even Karen Kingston was being paid by - not sure if she still is - https://rumble.com/v4hhuou-twc-red-flags-the-expanding-narrative-network.html

I just watched Amazing Polly's most recent video - she says TWC are attacking her on twitter - and that she was battling hyperthyroidism but has gotten that straightened out - so now she feels stronger to fight TWC back.

Expand full comment

it is important to stay vigilant. Any good organization can be subverted with just one or two people on the board of directors. The safest is to create your own companies of people who are accountable to you and to whom you are accountable

Expand full comment

Hi Daniel - thanks so much for the communication - btw - I put out a newsletter every night - called NEWS BITES - and its free - it comes as an email. If you would like to received it - please send me an email anncaspian@gmail.com

Expand full comment

"I couldn’t get a Texas medical license because the Canadian health authorities I used to work for refuses to send the necessary documentation to confirm my employment history."

Sound like you need a lawyer. It's amazing how the threat of a lawsuit can get things moving, especially if it includes a claim for damages. Be sure to name the individual responsible for that decision in the suit because it sounds like they are acting out of turn.

I would start here:

https://www.thedemocracyfund.ca/about

Expand full comment

Phenomenal post. 🙏❤

Expand full comment

I mentioned you in my article for a news outlet of Argentina, I hope that is ok, just what did happen to you for heal people with Ivermectin

Expand full comment

Thank you!

Expand full comment

Can you go personally to Canada and look for the paperwork you need to work in the States? There are also a lot of need of country doctors and they are not so picky or in some states too like South Dakota, what about Puerto Rico? or Mexico? I feel bad that decent people like you that we all should be proud to have around us cannot find a way through in the world. Do not get hopeless. I will put a prayer for you and prayers are powerful. Doctors like you are doing God's job, He will not let you down.

Expand full comment

I suspect that I cannot physically return to canada because of the last two court orders put against me in November and December of 2023. The last one implies that anyone who publishes online on a topic that I've been ordered not to publish about can be used as a cause to accuse me of violating a court order.

https://danielnagase.substack.com/p/my-substack-will-be-censored-in-5

Expand full comment

So Daniel is clearly laying out a philosophical scenario then he posing a philosophical question. He’s inviting us to a philosophical discussion about discovering a root cause. This is where we take him on his invitation and do…philosophy! I get we’re not used to practicing this but

- stating truths which only make us masters of the obvious is not philosophy

-praising him is not philosophy and it’s not what he’s asking for

-offering firm solutions is not philosophy.

You may or may not know an answer but still the process is to pose questions. Let’s just take a break from commenting for one place in a million and let’s do philosophy!

Expand full comment

It's not enough to know we're being deceived. We have to recognize the methods employed in order to counter them. This requires a deeper understand of how we use language than most people are familiar with. Language is the hidden ground of communication. How we use words and how we assign meaning to words is crucial for deciphering how language can be used to manipulate and deceive us.

All disciplines have their foundational elements, in this case we are talking about the pioneering work of Alfred Korzybski in his 1933 book 'Science and Sanity.'

https://oceanofpdf.com/?s=Alfred+Korzybski-Science-and-Sanity

Science and Sanity is aimed at an academic audience and should be treated as a reference book. It's heavy sledding, which is why Stuart Chase wrote 'The Tyranny of Words' in 1936 to make Korzybski's efforts more accessible. Start with his book if you find S&S too difficult.

https://oceanofpdf.com/?s=Stuart+Chase+-+The+Tyranny+of+Words

A now classic book on the use of language and images to deceive us is Vance Packard's 1957 work 'The Hidden Persuaders.'

https://oceanofpdf.com/?s=The+Hidden+Persuaders

Following that, I suggest readers research (not google) Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP). Read up on the subject, bearing in mind that some advocates of NLP are doing what Jordan Peterson does, that is, using it to deceive us. It's a sword that cuts both ways - it can be used to detect deception, but also to commit it. The techniques are similar to hypnosis, so be warned - once you're aware of the techniques you'll have to resist the temptation to use them, self-defence being the only ethical exception.

On the Jordan question, I watched the Amazing Polly clip, but I wouldn't assign it that much importance. As a psychologist, Peterson is well aware of NLP but he's not very good at it. Those pensive moments, the furrowed brow, the careful searching for words... it's all an act designed to convince you that he's a deep thinker. Sam Harris does the same thing, so does Tony Robins for that matter, and any number of people trying to sell you something. That doesn't mean they're controlled opposition, an overused term I've been accused of myself (*), just that they're doing what investment advisors call 'talking their book.' In many cases an actual book is involved, which they'd like you to buy on the premise that 'a fool and his money are soon parted.' Don't do that!

(*) if you point out the contradictions in the ethical position of figures like Sen. Ron Johnson, RFK Jr. or Charismatic Beard Guy, you will definitely be attacked by the True Believers.

Here's how to spot them:

https://oceanofpdf.com/?s=Eric+Hoffer+-+The+True+Believer+Thoughts+on+the+Nature+of+Mass+Movements

Expand full comment

The depths of programming in the English language are indeed very deep. Subversive programming even extends to theology. For example, when people repeat to themselves "The Lord is my shepherd" too many times, it makes them into sheep. Furthermore the subconscious confusion is also inserted into the entranced minds - who is the lord? Lord Conrad Black? The end result is people become compliant and obedient to any verbal or visual cues of "Lordship".

Expand full comment

Let's put a name to your Manila experience: Default Assumption.

Here's the classic formulation. See if you can spot the DA.

A boy and his father were driving home when their car was struck by a train at an uncontrolled railway crossing. The father was killed instantly while the boy survived but was seriously injured. Rushed to the emergency room at the local hospital, the ER doctor on duty called another doctor to the ER and said "you'll have to handle this. I can't operate on this boy, he's my son."

Expand full comment

The corruption goes so deep if they won't send the required documentation to Texas. Fill out freedom of information and have it sent to yourself, then forward it to where you need.. You need to use their own laws against them. They have to send you all the documents via their own act/omissions and directly to you through the freedom of information act. Then that way, you can forward it to Texas.

Expand full comment