Update on Baby Theo Part 3:

The faces of child abuse.

I was hoping that I would not have to write a Part 3 to the saga of Baby Theo’s hospital treatment. But yesterday, I received this message from the father of baby Theo:

• “September 28th I had my visit with Theo from 11:00am till 1:00.

  At noon, the RT came in to put on the humidifier to his vent, I chatted with her regarding the pressures and how cartilage forms and that Theo's last medical report said his lungs were over inflated and he has not had any pressure adjustments or trials off, she said she would talk to the Respirologist and discuss if there can be any changes.

  The access supervisor from MCFD, Melanie cut my visit short because i talked about Theo's care with th RT.

  She called 2 other nurses and they tried to get me to leave.

    I refused and said I want to spend time with my son as I can only see him once a week for 2 hours. They said I broke the contract with mcfd by discussing my son's medical care and that I must leave.

    They then called security and 3 men came into the room.  They warned if i don't comply i would be forcibly removed. 

  Theo was so perplexed by what was transpiring that he got tired and fell asleep in my arms.

  I put him in his bed and was escorted out.

  The 3 security men told me later I was very polite and they will put it in their report.”

  

  

  ---

The Medical Report

What was Theo’s father referring to when he said Theo’s lungs were OVERINFLATED ?

He was referring to this medical report.

Notice that the radiologist (Medical Doctor who reads x-rays as a specialty), states:

“…Lungs are hyperinflated, similar to prior.”

What is the “prior”?

The prior is the “COMPARISON: Chest radiograph September 12th, 2023.”

So what are we to CONCLUDE?

There was at least 2 Chest X-Rays showing that Baby Theo’s lungs were hyperinflated.

I hoped that after there was video proof of Baby Theo breathing on his own on February 15th, 2023, doctors would have heeded the message in my first post over a month ago on Aug 19, 2023. I hoped that doctors would have started to wean Baby Theo off the ventilator by reducing the ventilator pressures, so he could learn to breathe on his own and develop his respiratory cartilage.

There was no medical reason not to see if Baby Theo breathing for 30 minutes on his own could be extended into 30 minutes twice a day, 3 times a day, then an hour at a time. Gradual reduction of ventilator pressures is standard of care if a patient is making breathing efforts on their own. Proven video showing Baby Theo fully off a mechanical ventilator is an urgent sign that a patient is ready to get off a ventilator.

At least 2 x-rays showing HYPERINFLATION of Theo’s lungs, on September 12th, 2023 and September 15th, 2023 is an EMERGENCY sign for reducing the ventilator pressures. The one time I witnessed Theo’s ventilator settings they were at 18 / 10, and that was on August 10th, 2023. His ventilator settings according to Theos parents have been at 20 / 10 since then.

As of September 22nd, 2023, this pediatrics note states there is no plans to wean the ventilator from settings of “IPAP 20, EPAP 10” ( 20 / 10 ), despite the fact there were 2 chest x-rays from Sept 12 AND 15 showing Theo’s lungs were overinflated.

As of yesterday, September28th, 2023 I’ve had confirmation that Theo’s ventilator was still set at 20 / 10. There’s been no reduction of ventilator pressures despite TWICE PROVEN hyperinflation of the lungs.

---

How can any doctor keep a baby able to breathe on his own on a ventilator AFTER PROVEN HARM?

(Hyperinflation is not a natural state for anyone’s lungs.)

Isn’t the goal for any child who started off life with multiple medical problems, a return to normal childhood? Why were doctors and social workers at BC Children’s Hospital standing in the way of Baby Theo developing just like every other child born into this world?

---

When there is harm being done, the question often arises, what can be done about it? Before any thing “is done”, the fairest thing would be to verify if the people doing wrong know that they are doing wrong. If they did not know they were doing harm, notifying them first is the fairest action to give them an opportunity to rectify the harms they’ve done or are doing.

Do I know if Baby Theo’s doctors read my article explaining the medical reasons why Theo should be allowed to learn to breathe on his own? I did this exactly 40 days ago, on August 19th, 2023 when I published the first article on Theo. (In reality, the medical team had greater that 40 days notice when I spoke to the pediatrician Dr. Annie Dymytryshyn on August 10th, 2023 informing her of the necessity of reducing ventilator settings in a patient who has the proven ability to breathe on his own.)

Did the rest of the team read my article?

No, I don’t know with certainty. But I do know that the Social Workers at the British Columbia Ministry of Child and Family Development are aware of what I write. They mention me in their letter that I quote when I wrote part 2 of of Theo’s saga.

To summarize:

• Social workers involved with Theo have read my articles.

• I explained in person to both a pediatrician in training and the staff Pediatrician Annie Dmytryshyn why it was important to give baby Theo opportunities to breathe on his own, from both a cell biology and a medical perspective.

• Can ANY DOCTOR INVLOVED in the care of Theo claim ignorance of his situation? Can ANY DOCTOR be ignorant of the need to reduce Theo’s dependence on a mechanical ventilator?

(Weak cartilage, such as what Theo has with his tracheomalacia, can be mechanically stimulated to strengthen and grow by reducing the pressures on his ventilator. I explain cartilage metabolism in:

Over ventilating him to the point of HYPERINFLATION of his lungs has precisely the opposite effect. It thins out his infant airways and cartilage through TOO MUCH PRESSURE! This only makes him MORE ventilator dependent!)

Could this be INTENTIONAL?

Is someone benefiting from Theo being on a ventilator for years?

---

How many doctors are COMPLICIT in this continuing ABUSE of Theo by refusing to reduce his ventilator pressures?

How can doctors ignore the X-Ray Proven damage to Baby Theo’s lungs?

Is Dr. Ralph Rothstein, an alleged director at BC Children’s hospital, aware of Baby Theo’s situation? I have written proof that the social workers read my substack. Does the respirologist Dr. Chilvers? Pediatrician Dr. Choko? Or infectious diseases “specialist” Dr. Meesters?

---

It gets worse, now the doctors are Vaccinating Theo against his parents consent.

(Do Vaccines even work in TRAF 7 gene anomaly patients?)

In the Medical Literature, there are about 50 individuals with the Traf 7 genetic anomaly known worldwide. Should they get the same childhood injections intended for the other 7 billion people here? Is there any evidence children with a molecular anomaly in every cell of their body will benefit from vaccines? I have not seen any. A sample size of 50 individuals is too small to draw any conclusions about the benefits or harms of vaccinations both in the short term or long term.

• Traf molecular pathways are involved in Tumor necrosis factor signalling which is also involved in immune signalling pathways.

• How can any immunologist say that Theo should get childhood vaccinations when EVERY CELL IN HIS BODY OPERATES DIFFERENTLY FROM THE REST OF US?

Here’s what the pediatric “infectious disease” specialist wrote:

“Full vaccination series has to be completed in order to achieve optimal immune response and protection disease…”

The fact that this unnamed “Infectious Diseases” specialist makes this statement 3 pages after acknowledging Theo’s Traf 7 gene abnormality is proof of incompetence.

---

Even I was taught in medical school over 20 years ago that recent vaccinations were a risk factor for sudden infant death syndrome. In 2002, a pediatrician at Dalhousie medical school taught us this. But the harms of childhood vaccinations was not breaking news back then either. Almost 50 years ago in 1975, the age of childhood vaccinations was raised to 24 months from 3 months in Japan. This was due to a string of infant deaths after VACCINATION. The number of vaccine death claims after raising the age to 2 years old dropped by 90%.

Why on earth would the pediatricians at BC Children’s Hospital expose Theo repeatedly to a medical treatment that increases the risk of sudden death? Theo already is battling a number of medical problems since birth. Now doctors are adding to the stress on his body by vaccinating him? (With no proof of benefit in a Traf 7 genetic variant body?)

• I write about the deadly history of infant vaccinations here:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8255173/

---

Child abuse?

On August 2nd, against his parents wishes, Theo received multiple vaccinations meant to catch up for all the vaccines Theo “missed” from 2, 4, 6, and 12 months of age. 16 days later, Theo’s breathing declined to the point where he needed transfer to the ICU at children’s hospital on August 18th.

A resident doctor told Theo’s mother that being sent to ICU was done as a precaution because Theo had increased oxygen requirements, and “secretions”, thought to be a viral infection. But respiratory problems were not the only event to follow vaccination. Baby Theo’s weight gain also stalled afterwards, despite having had his G-tube changed to a more invasive G-J feeding tube.

• Is this decline in health related to multiple vaccinations?

• Injections given despite no proof that vaccines even work with TRAF-7 Gene anomaly?

Starting on August 18th, both Mother and Father were banned from even seeing Theo for a month. I explained in Part 2 why the sudden estrangement of a baby from his familiar parents would cause stress, and increase his chances of a critical illness as well as poor development.

https://danielnagase.substack.com/i/136660917/back-to-medicine

Yet the social workers went ahead anyway, deprived an infant of his mother, while the doctors stood by and did nothing. Did the social workers do this to spite the parents? Can the social workers and doctors claim not to KNOW about the harms they were causing Theo? Did they harm Theo because:

• Theo’s mother and father wanted what is best for Theo?

• They wanted Theo to learn to breathe on his own?

---

Was it spite?

Let’s revisit what the social worker wrote:

Baby Theo continues to be harmed by the Pediatricians and Nurses at BC Children’s hospital.

Even though 40 days notice has been given, doctors have made no remedy to the harms done by needless ventilation. Proven evidence of harm was made on September 12th and 15th, 2023 on Chest X-Rays, and still no rectification of harm.

The choice right now is a moral one. There’s a principle that great evils can result from an accumulation of smaller ones. How do small wrongdoings add up to great injustices? Consider this.

Wrongs such as “Turning the other cheek”, “just following orders”, and “not wanting to rock the boat” can all add up to pave the way for great injustices, such as what we are seeing done to Baby Theo. Small wrongs done by the people like in the photographs above, obeying orders to remove a father holding a sleeping child.

Is it believable that the security guards didn’t know they were doing an injustice?

Is it credible that the nurses did not know that it was wrong to call security because Theo’s father mentioned that lowering the ventilator might help with the hyperinflation damage to Theo’s lungs?

Every individual who contributes to Theo’s child abuse to “keep their job”, is harming a baby for money.

Could you consider such people innocent?

Do their small wrongs enable the great wrong of Theo’s doctors causing possibly permanent harm to a child?

Do guilty parties have any moral right to “Annonymity?”

Jennifer Donnely:

Are these the faces of Child Abuse?

You Decide.